Why is it that GE had to “bid low” for renewal of their E and F-class gas turbine entitlement CSA’s? Was it to keep the contract in the fold so they could continue their backlog financial manipulations and pull forward the earnings to keep their quarterly bonuses coming, as well as their fealty to JI and SB and the magic $2 EPS? Of course it was. But why offer pricing on these renewals that even had their customers scratching their heads? It’s not like there was or is real competition out there able to take those away from GE. How should customers react when Iconic GE sales Execs wing in on the corporate jet, a BAFO letter in hand, put it on the customers desk and say “....if I walk out of here, you’ll never see this type of deal again.” Does it make rationale business sense to offer significant CSA price reductions for tens or perhaps a hundred million in cash up front so quarterly numbers could be met? Or a financial structured contract the customer will for sure take but garunteeed not to make a cent of FCF for GE at the end of the day? I’d call this Ponzi scheme the “Whimpy Scheme”; Whimpy was always asking Popeye or Olive Oil “I’d gladly pay you Tuesday for a Hamburger today.” Money for nothin’, get ur CSA for free. All this new talk about getting price back on transactional and CSA renewals is rich when you’ve conditioned the customer irrationally to expect to-good-to-be-true prices. Synchophonic, spineless leadership at GE only worried about their stock grants and options, and really, late in the night, when it’s most quiet, they know they are on a train to nowhere......so many more shoes to drop.