Thread regarding Sears layoffs

Reuters

Sears chairman's takeover proposal faces moment of truth

Jessica DiNapoli, Mike Spector

NEW YORK, Jan 15 (Reuters) - Negotiations between Sears Holdings Corp Chairman Eddie Lampert and the bankrupt U.S. department store operator approached a resolution late on Tuesday as the billionaire hedge fund manager faced the choice of improving his $5 billion offer for the company or ending his takeover plans, people familiar with the matter told Reuters.

After two days of haggling, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert Drain set a Wednesday deadline to complete the bankruptcy auction for the 126-year-old retailer, the people said. Sears was weighing Lampert’s offer against the sum it would recoup by winding down its business and selling its assets off in pieces.

Liquidating Sears would end the department store in its current form, meaning layoffs for as many as 68,000 people and the closure of about 500 stores.

Last week Lampert, through his hedge fund ESL Investments Inc, made an improved $5 billion offer for Sears after the company turned away his earlier $4.4 billion bid.

But the same issues that dogged his earlier offer were proving to be hurdles for his $5 billion proposal.

Sears believes the bid falls short of covering the bills the retailer has racked up since filing for bankruptcy protection in October, the people said. A bedrock principle of bankruptcy cases is that those expenses, known as administrative claims, must be fully repaid.

Sears is also pushing Lampert to offer more money in exchange for a legal release that would shield him from future litigation over transactions he did with the company in the past, the people added. Lampert has said the deals were proper.

Lampert’s $5 billion offer had taken on another $600 million-plus in liabilities, and marked $35 million for a so-called release from litigation.

Sears declined to comment.

The bankruptcy auction for Sears began on Monday morning in Manhattan at the offices of law firm Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, which is representing the retailer. On Tuesday, representatives for Sears and Lampert briefed Drain on the status of the auction, the people said.

Drain pressed both Lampert and the company to continue negotiating and to end their discussions one way or the other before Tuesday comes to a close, the people said.

Sears last week made liquidation preparations before reaching a last-minute deal with Lampert that resulted in his latest bid, leading to the auction that commenced on Monday. (Reporting by Jessica DiNapoli and Mike Spector in New York Editing by Bill Rigby)

by
| 1345 views | | 9 replies (last January 16, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+X9cg6XZ

9 replies (most recent on top)

Eddie will go all in to win . Every cent.

The boat will get repossessed , and Eddies bride will be shopping at JC Penneys.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tng+X9cg6XZ

That’s not what the sentence says you f---ing mo--ns. Learn how to read.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yhw+X9cg6XZ

@X9cg6XZ-pkl

Why would any authentic insider(s) post information on an anonymous internet board?

Most of the informstion posted is an opinion or copied and pasted from the internet.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tdi+X9cg6XZ

For the umpteenth time, "the pension" (the part you care about, the checks you receive from it) is not getting "screwed" regardless of what happens with Eddie/Sears/lawsuits. The PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTEE CORP (PBGC) - guess what? - guarantees your pension. Nobody getting a pension will lose a dime unless you're one of the few highly-paid people with a pension over $65k/year.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oeb+X9cg6XZ

if Eddie get out of lawsuits the pension will get screwed. He sold stores to himself to Sears detriment , leaving less money to fund the pension and pay billed owed. I think the offer will get rejected in the end

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @quy+X9cg6XZ

Please...just end it already. Don't give Eddie what he wants.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zhx+X9cg6XZ

He doesn't have the money and the ones giving him the money are id--ts they wont see it again.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aqz+X9cg6XZ

All that sentence means is that they’re comparing Eddie’s offer against what they think they can recover in a liquidation scenario. It never makes any reference to what the recovery would actually be in a liquidation scenario as opposed to selling out to Eddie. I have a suspicion that at the last minute Eddie will drop another 250-500 million and put it into the lawsuit immunity payoff, winning the bid in the process.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wup+X9cg6XZ

Last sentence from paragraph two, it states that the company will make more if its sold in pieces. So does it mean he wasn't able to get the whole company and now it will most likely be sold on pieces?

Any insiders know what went down?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pkl+X9cg6XZ

Post a reply

: