To the last poster: You're confusing the "transformation we need" with the "transformation we're getting."
Most in Systems seem to agree that:
1) ISD was a bad idea and flooded Systems with people who did not belong here.
2) Systems is way too top heavy and has been for decades
3) Much of management hasn't a clue what's going on in the trenches
4) Roles need to be consolidated, made less specialized, made more industry standard.
And yes, some of that is happening. But here's what not happening:
1) People are not being held more accountable -- performance is NOT being used to determine who stays and who goes. In understaffed roles, poor performers are being retained. In Overstaffed roles, cuts are made without regard for performance so good and bad employees are being cut in equal measure.
2) Many of the managers being kept are part of the problem. Take a good look at who was behind CDE. Notice how many of the faces are the same? You think these guys are going to make things better?
3) Which brings me to my third point: the vast majority of the cuts are specifically because of CDE. They're certainly not about correcting 30 years worth of poor hiring and firing practices. Case in point: ISD. Case in point: All the other BA roles that worked just fine before CDE that were rendered ineffective after CDE.
4) Strategy is being obliterated. We're moving to a model where no one takes responsibility for shared systems and development teams will certainly collide with one another, often with mission critical consequences.
In Systems, this re-org is about fixing the mistakes they made 7 years ago. It's not about much else. And because they can't tell the baby from the bath water, they're throwing both out.