Thread regarding L3 Technologies layoffs

L3 is KNOWN for layoffs

Look, I have worked for big companies in the past and currently work for a company that has 4000+ employees. The only time when I witnessed completely justified layoffs was during 2008-2010. Have any of you any idea how many rounds of layoffs L3 has done since then??? You can blame it on profit, market, etc. but I blame it on poor leadership from the top.

I know many people who have worked for L3 in the past and know a few who currently still do. The personal accounts of many of them are eerily similar. There's even this joke when you find out if someone has worked at L3 in the past and you automatically ask "what round of layoff they were a part of." See, that's what they're mostly known for "LAYOFFS."

If the market is the main one responsible for the layoffs, how come my company (mainly financially government dependent) and many..many others haven't had a single market based layoff since 2010?

Why expand when you can't financially afford it? Why give out such huge bonuses to management when you can use that money to keep the people that will truly help you stay ahead in the future? Why hire so many employees all at once, train them, and then 6 months later lay off the higher paid workers? Doesn't management see that this is a major disaster waiting to happen? Fines, lawsuits, you name it.

Although my spouse likes working with many of his coworkers and managers, the thought of him/her coming home one THURSDAY (ahhh those famous Thursdays) will always taunt us. What if we're next?

Managers caring and feeling sorry for the people they regularly lay off doesn't mean a damn thing to someone who has spent the last 10-20 years serving the company.

Fix your policies. Don't act like you see more than just numbers because it's clear that you don't and that's fine, it's only normal in the business world but the least you can do is hire someone that will fix those numbers and fix your broken company.

Originally posted by @STAjvaN-1vle.

by
| 2331 views | | 3 replies (last July 7, 2018) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+SW6iB3M

3 replies (most recent on top)

Agree!! Last CSW LAY -OFF’s consisted of a 5 page back to back list of employee names that were primarily 40+ years old, with 15 above Year’s of Service making 85K + annual and with high Performance scores. These are the people that worked 50+ hrs. a week, while those employee’s who spend at least 6 hrs. of their day b---s---ting ( I have several logs of visiting that totals 6hrs) , sleeping, talking on their cells, doing school homework or running to get their big gulps are still there.

But, hey, if that is the quality of work and time L-3 wants to charge the government that is their choice. Get rid of high performers and keep the low Performance rating employee’s at lower pay is real smart L-3. Those making 85K, that L-3 choose to kick to the curb is nothing compared to what executives spend weekly on entertaining costs and big bonuses.

This has to be an Andy and Jim move!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @16ood+SW6iB3M

I'm not sure that L3 is any more notorious for layoffs than other companies in the defense sector. However, it does have a pretty active and anguished presence here on thelayoff.com

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mjb+SW6iB3M

Another well stated comment.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fdc+SW6iB3M

Post a reply

: