Thread regarding Sally Beauty Holdings Inc. layoffs

Shelf Life's and Business Cycles

All companies go through a business life cycle, the startup where innovation and creativity are king, to gaining market share and establishing a position in the industry, to peak market share and possibly the peak of the market itself, depending on anything from technological advances to geopolitical changes like moving most manufacturing to China and India.

For these reasons, almost all companies will have a "shelf life" which is the duration a company can remain relevant, and therefore profitable.

To top Executives, these concepts are basic and well understood. They know exactly where the company is in its life cycle, as well as the industry they are in. So, when they decide to expand, contract, or even bring to a close the business, it's done with a deep understanding of what the future holds.

Unfortunately, the average peon working for these companies is utterly clueless about these things, and so if they see decisions being made which are "bad for the company" because to the peon it just looks like the execs are making a mistake, when in reality they're purposefully bringing the company to a close, the peons ignorantly assume the execs are stupid or incompetent.

The execs know this, and just laugh, because that's all you can do when a 3 year old tells you that you're "doing it wrong!"

by
| 1611 views | | 2 replies (last April 29, 2018) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+SSN6JaW

2 replies (most recent on top)

"The Brilliance in Failure" sounds about right if you're Chris Brickman and team. I bet that failure tastes real good in the pockets. The company's downward turn was an excuse to tap into the goods before they're gone. It's like upper management decided, "What we wanted to do isn't working so let's take what we can get before we drive the business into the ground." Round after round of "professionals" and "executives" that claim they qualify for upper management while their performance was and is a joke. I am ashamed of things I witnessed at corporate. Some of the worst offenders were in operations and spoke about the field employees like they were trash. And then show off and take selfies and schmooze with employees like they were girlfriends (they forgot about the boyfriends) in the know together. What is it that you know, exactly? Definitely not familiar with the Sally customer base. Business risks of every possible type were ignored and passed around like a hot potato until someone dropped it. Multimillion dollar fines and fees for breaches and continued ignorance. The annual statements speak for themselves and that's assuming full disclosure. Their overboard strategies never materialized and they let go of valuable tenured employees that were far more "in the know" than the clowns that cycle in and out of upper management. I could go on. I guarantee you that while the "execs" are laughing at the peons, the "peons" are equally amused. Do you want to guess why? Because they know deep down that a peon could have done it better.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3hmi+SSN6JaW

Was this post from Christian A. Brickman the author of "The Brilliance of Failure" or another MBA genius from Sally?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ynf+SSN6JaW

Post a reply

: