Thread regarding Schlumberger Ltd. layoffs

More PK desperate attempt, breaking tradition to compete with customers

The next oil major? Service firm Schlumberger's big bet on production

Published September 08, 2017 Oil Reuters

January 16, 2015. REUTERS/Richard Carson (Copyright Reuters 2017)

The world’s largest oilfield services company, Schlumberger NV (SLB), is spending billions of dollars buying stakes in its customers’ oil and gas projects - investing in the same ventures it supplies with equipment and expertise.

The new business model gives Schlumberger a say in drilling decisions, oilfield management and even on hiring other Schlumberger units for service contracts, the company has told investors.

The expanded operational authority saves Schlumberger from bidding for each of the many jobs that typically require separate contracts on a large drilling project - effectively locking out the firm’s competitors.

Schlumberger’s gamble could upend the service business model throughout the industry, as rivals including General Electric Co’s (GE) unit Baker Hughes say they are considering whether to adopt similar strategies.

The model can supercharge profits on a given job but also ramps up risk, giving the firm more exposure to global oil price swings and potentially big losses if individual projects fail. The downsides have some analysts questioning whether the traditionally conservative firm is taking on too many speculative projects too quickly.

Schlumberger already has taken hundreds of millions in write-downs or impairments on some of these joint ventures, according to its financial filings.

Traditionally, oil producers manage the risk and make the financial and operational decisions on projects; they pay service providers a fee to carry out individual jobs. Firms such as Schlumberger typically supply a wide variety of services, such as well design, along with technology and staff to run rigs.

Schlumberger declined to make executives available for interviews and did not respond to written questions about its production business.

More from FOX Business

Gas shortage grows worse as Florida preps for Irma

Hurricane Irma: Florida gas lines form

Oil refineries are coming back quickly amid Harvey: Fmr. Shell Oil president

Despite early setbacks, Schlumberger has committed cash to growing the division, called Schlumberger Production Management, since its launch in 2011. Last year, it generated $1.4 billion in revenue. It had investment of $2.6 billion as of June 30, Schlumberger Executive Vice President Patrick Schorn told investors earlier this summer.

The company’s investments have the firm co-managing about 230,000 barrels a day of oil and gas output at the end of 2016 - about as much as one of the largest U.S. independent producers, Pioneer Natural Resources (PXD).

This year, the company stepped up the financing role, opening a standalone investment fund to provide financing for the ventures. The company has not disclosed the size of the fund.

Such ventures require a breadth of skills and a tolerance for risk generally found at large integrated oil companies such as Chevron Corp (CVX) and Exxon Mobil Corp (XOM).

Two of Schlumberger’s newest partnerships - a deepwater liquefied natural gas project off the coast of Equatorial Guinea and an Argentina shale development with YPF SA - involve decision-making and operational authority similar to that typically held by multinational oil producers.

In June, Schlumberger agreed to invest $700 million in an oil exploration project with Nigerian National Petroleum Corp and First Exploration & Production that would require global oil prices of between $50 to $60 a barrel to achieve a 20 percent profit, research house Bernstein estimated in a report published in July. Current prices are struggling to break out of the bottom of that range.

Competing with customers

As Schlumberger’s production business has grown, it has negotiated deals that include equity in oil and gas fields and as well as deals that give the firm payment based on oil and gas output, according to interviews with customers, partners, investors and former Schlumberger executives.

Schlumberger this year agreed to contribute $390 million for a 49 percent stake in a venture with YPF in Argentina’s Vaca Muerta shale field, which has attracted international oil firms including Chevron and Royal Dutch Shell (RDSA).

Schlumberger Chief Executive Paal Kibsgaard has downplayed the potential for its production business to compete with its own oil company customers.

He described the enterprise as “a new avenue for project investments alongside our customers” in remarks to investors in April.

Schorn also insisted this spring that the business is “not significantly changing the risk profile ... the biggest risk remains the cyclical nature” of the oil and gas industry.

'Capability and cash'

Investors say Schlumberger, which held $6.22 billion in cash and short-term investments at June 30, is strong enough to handle any increased risks and the price volatility of its investments in long-term projects.

As both project manager and service provider, Schlumberger also has an enviable level of control over operations, said Mike Breard of Dallas-based wealth management firm Hodges Capital, which invests in oilfield service companies.

“I like the long-term aspect of it – the fact that they are telling frack crews where to work, and using their own equipment more efficiently than might be used by some other operator,” he said.

British-based natural gas explorer Sound Energy PLC was happy to give Schlumberger full rights to the service contracts on drilling projects in Morocco in exchange for a Schlumberger investment amounting to 27 percent of total costs, said the chief of British-based natural gas explorer.

Schlumberger will get 27.5 percent of revenue from the oil produced.

“We’re smaller and entrepreneurial. Schlumberger has the technical capability and cash. That’s the nature of the partnership,” Sound CEO James Parsons said in an interview.

The duo has completed three wells in Morocco and plans to drill three more by year end.

“It’s a $50 [million] or $60 million bet for them so far,” Parsons said.

Schlumberger’s appetite for these ventures is spurring rivals to consider similar financing and services deals. Baker Hughes recently agreed to provide about $10 million in financing to Twinza Oil’s first offshore gas field in Papua New Guinea, supplying the cash to prove the merits of the field.

“It allows Twinza to have success in going out to raise financing,” Baker Hughes CEO Lorenzo Simonelli said.

Baker Hughes will not take a stake in the oilfield, unlike some of Schlumberger’s joint investments with producers.

Risk and loss

In 2014 and 2015, Schlumberger took nearly $400 million in combined write-offs on oil production investments, including an Eagle Ford shale field in south Texas that struggled after oil prices crashed.

It also is owed about $900 million by Ecuador. In July, the South American country said it had negotiated a payment plan that includes an expanded contract that has Schlumberger agreeing to invest another $1 billion in the venture.

Schlumberger hasn’t commented on the South American nation’s disclosure. It previously acknowledged taking Ecuadorian bonds in lieu of cash for $150 million in bills. It also previously estimated its investment in the projects at up to $4.9 billion over 20 years.

The write downs have stirred some on Wall Street to question whether Schlumberger should take more conservative path with its oil production partnerships.

The firm’s production division “used to focus on production management of well understood low-risk oil fields,” said Colin Davies, a Bernstein oilfield services analyst. “Now it has expanded into frankly somewhat more speculative ventures.”

by
| 2741 views | | 12 replies (last September 11, 2017) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+PbiRxSv

12 replies (most recent on top)

It'd be easier to buy into this if SLB was currently demonstrating best in class all around oil field services - its actual business.

But it doesn't even seem to be achieving that - and now its going to be able to excel at a business its NOT actually structured for?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2gri+PbiRxSv

Manage your risk and understand probability theory. Be selective with whom you form partnerships and avoid backwater, disreputable oil companies. There are snakes in the oil business like anywhere else and some would say the biggest snakes are oil service companies.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fdr+PbiRxSv

This is financial suicide, all the majors are trying to back out of big contracts funding is still under tight control. SLB start buying up bad marginal projects which others have walked away from.....If something smells bad it is usually bad.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ajg+PbiRxSv

This one has me worried with this one, every trial run is with a poor organization with a history of not paying the regular service or sales contracts prices. So why on earth are they going to pay for a even bigger invoice or recognize or share of the profits - plus it relies on decent oil prices. They have already started the write-downs at the same time as buying in more, clients must be laughing at the naivety of SLB!

This appears like a gambling addict who thinks the next big gamble will get them out of the debt, or in SLB case the board are self-medicating themselves in their financial gambling addition by buying into another "big win" chance or take more risk.

This will sink SLB, the comedy part if BHI or HAL copy them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mvb+PbiRxSv

The oil service business is over-populated with low intellect buffoons driven to complaining about everything and unable to sift through detail or construct meaningful and sensible arguments. They have defined those who have become the losers in life.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ghb+PbiRxSv

There is nothing wrong with going outside of convention to see if there's a way to do things more intelligently. It might succeed, it might fail but at least it's worth some debate. This, surely, is more appealing than having a mob standing on the sidelines barking their objections and offering nothing. Someone has to take the lead and someone has to make decisions while the rest can hide behind the anonymity of the those who have no conviction and even less courage.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1beg+PbiRxSv

There is an obvious reason why slb or any other service firms have never involved in oil production. Why would Exxon hire slb for services if slb is competing with them heads on in production arena? Same as if Boeing starts to fly passengers and cutting prices using their own jets to compete with existing airlines. It's a conflict of interests and achieves nothing but distrust from customers.

PK is desperate, because he needs to show the board some accomplishments, and he knows it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @szv+PbiRxSv

Does seem as though this is a desperate measure to mitigate the losses that SLB have had to endure in the past few years it also seems to be a measure it has taken to mitigate the problems of low oil prices. Taking more risks in an already risky environment hoping they pay off - it is a big gamble.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oam+PbiRxSv

The fundamental problem for SLB and why it is set to fail: SLB management and its success is driven by short term metrics and rewards, 12 month to three year objectives, promotion and bonus attached. As a manager this is a great, close the deal, secure the contracts, collect the bonus. The risk is borne by the shareholders. It smacks of a dying company in a dying industry, take as much as you can while you can.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fsw+PbiRxSv

This is a disaster looking for somewhere to happen. Economic laws have never been schlumbergers strong points. Funding large projects and hoping money will eventually roll in is worse than gambling. Schlumberger still thinks that oil will rise inexorably. Welcome to the swansong.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ouy+PbiRxSv

Impressed by what? By their daydream? You call this as "inventive thinking"? Are you daydreaming too?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vxn+PbiRxSv

You have to be somewhat impressed with the endeavour shown by Slb. To outsmart their competitors by inventive thinking and breaking out of the traditional mould is highly praiseworthy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zwo+PbiRxSv

Post a reply

: