Thread regarding Schlumberger Ltd. layoffs

Halliburton Posts International Revenue Growth, Unlike Schlumberger

Oct 23 (Reuters) - Worldwide revenues rose for U.S. oilfield services provider Halliburton Co in the third quarter, the company said on Monday, contrasting with the slide in international markets reported by larger rival Schlumberger last week.

International markets are becoming more important for U.S. oil companies, as industry executives brace for the North American fracking frenzy to slow, or "tap the brakes," as Halliburton had put it in July.

"Our North American business is hitting on all cylinders and our international business proved resilient in a challenging environment," Chief Executive Jeff Miller said Monday after Halliburton posted its third quarter results.

Halliburton said it completed more oil wells and charged higher prices for fracking in North America, which makes up almost 60 percent of its overall sales.

That helped the company post a profit of 42 cents a share in the third quarter ended Sept 30, beating analysts' average estimates by 5 cents, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.

"The concern was that the company would beat sell-side numbers, but disappoint buy-side expectations," said Credit Suisse, pegging that estimate at 40 cents.

Houston-based Halliburton said revenue from North America surged 91 percent to $3.16 billion in the quarter, while international sales rose nearly 5 percent.

Cross-town neighbor Schlumberger, the world's largest oilfield service company, had reported a 2 percent drop in international revenues in the quarter, and warned of a weak fourth quarter.

Halliburton said revenue from completion and production from oil wells rose 63 percent to $3.54 billion in the latest quarter. Overall revenue rose 42 percent to $5.44 billion.

(Reporting by Yashaswini Swamynathan and Nivedita Bhattacharjee in Bengaluru)

by
| 2131 views | | 4 replies (last October 26, 2017) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+PUItJyy

4 replies (most recent on top)

When 60% of the staff moving every 1.5 years the companies overall efficiency per employee is 2/3’s that of Halliburton. If anyone stayed in their job more than 2 years you would fine a significant increase is productivity allowing SLB to reduce staffing levels by at least 1/3. It would also add stability and accountability by forcing people to deliver instead of coasting to the next job. Don’t worry it will never happen.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2xym+PUItJyy

a lot of time, money and energy has been put into the upbringing of the managers , they are an investment in and of themselves and will continue to be guiding providence of the company , they are there for an intended purpose and will continue to support our movements through these troubling times.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2are+PUItJyy

If you lay off all the people who clean the toilets to save the jobs of the managers, sooner or later the company starts to stink. Schlumberger has never valued those who do the real work. Now it's biting them in the azz.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fyl+PUItJyy

Slb needs to take care of our investment and stocks,

They have to fire mafia connected people.

Slb has to cut costs and get rid of liabilities.

Junk people, useless people, stupid people, back office s--- as finance people, useless HR people.

How come bigger companies such as GE have only a quarter of our back office staff????

So many managers so many team leads so many project managers....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hfp+PUItJyy

Post a reply

: