There were 7 from Santa Ana last week. I feel this is a bad decision while execs still take a huge chunk in forms of bonus. So, it's a paradox, you keep cutting costs so you can continue to operate and you are increasing costs by giving more bonuses. I am confused now?
So, it's OK to spend on the executives but the little guy can be cut at any given point in time.
This is absolutely true. Shame on those CXO's and Exec's if they even take a single penny as bonus by stealing bread of innocent people and ruining their Christmas Holidays. Grow a Spine CXO's including the CEO's and VP's.
Managers are way too micro managing and they just got rid of the best talent and top performers from different groups as some of them felt threatened by people who had better knowledge ,expertise to even take over their Managers job.
The new CTO,Exec's lacks basic business and technical sense both. Stop resorting to layoffs and try to fix your Procurement process, retain good talent and train them if needed for them to be able to perform effectively than spending huge amounts on Vendor's. Empower your own people and give them the flexibility and freedom than micro managing them and shutting them down when they try to give valuable suggestions.
This is true, there was a small cut in Santa Ana about 3 months ago.