We all know what the modus operandi with the company and its system for closing stores: leased stores almost always close when the lease is up, owned stores are sold if it's located in a lucrative/viable market.
However there are hundreds of smaller Sears stores that are barely viable, if at all and are attached to a dead mall with no viability for a future merchant whatsoever. These stores also are in great need of remedial work, both structurally and aesthetically.
Why is Sears slow to close those stores and quick to get rid of good performing stores just because the lease is up, and if SHLD is really only in it for the real estate, wouldn't these "junk" stores offset any income realized from the few "gem" stores in viable markets?
Nobody will want to buy an old asbestos ridden store in disrepair, attached to a dead mall (if applicable) in a town of less than 20-50,000 people. There are tons of Sears--and for that matter, Kmarts--that are in this category.