Thread regarding Schlumberger Ltd. layoffs

Engage to excel, Petrotechnical experts and Management objectives.

Last year's "engage to excel" survey has shown that the "Petrotechnical experts" (PTEs) were on average much less "engaged" than the rest of Slb employees (which, themselves were not particularly engaged).

The management recently decided to come up with an emergency response plan to remotivate this workforce. They promised us an increased involvement in business decisions, better career visibility and promotion potential, plus time and support for innovating and making a difference.

This was announced last week, and it all sounded good.

Alas, this week - by mistake - HR sent the Key Performance Objectives of the Geomarket Operations manager of my segment (Ooops, product line), i.e., our sole and only boss, to all employees Grade 10 and above.

What did we discover? He has absolutely zero objectives related to "engagement" or "engage to excel". Zero. He actually has only three objectives: the first one is about year-on-year IBT growth, the second one about the quarterly net made by his team and the third one related to the days sales outstanding (i.e., how long does it take to get our services paid). End of the story.

Oh, and he promised to entirely chop off of our subsegment (and ourselves) if we don't manage to achieve a better IBT than last year. In the meantime, everybody was piled into an open floor plan, like cattle.

We are now super engaged (into job searches).

by
| 2501 views | | 4 replies (last June 1, 2017) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+NswNRf9

4 replies (most recent on top)

Why on earth is there a Bahamas geomarket in the first place? Lot of drilling going on there that nobody knows about?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7hli+NswNRf9

Hey f--- u jack

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3wjk+NswNRf9

Interestingly, there was another reply mentioning the fact that after a heated meeting the Bahamas geomarket (?) decided that it wasn't worth it retaining the PTEs in the current market conditions and thus advising the OP to find a new job as an operator in the Permian (Basin, that is), but that reply is now nowhere to be found.

This post didn't contain, as far as I remember, any profanity and while one may claim that revealing the contents of discussions that occurred in a meeting of a private company is a potential breach of confidentiality, I somewhat doubt it would trigger a proactive removal from the website's owner (basically, if that was the case half of this website would have to be deleted).

Two options remain: the content removal was requested by the individual that posted it (but how would the website's owner identify him/her?) or it was requested by the entity that was cited in the post (slb, but in that case why didn't they require to remove the whole thread?). A third option being that in order to avoid any kind of legal troubles, Thelayoffs agrees to any removal request, wherever they come from.

In any case, let's hope slb realizes that they have beter things to worry about (and spend money on)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3brg+NswNRf9

Another 'brilliant' Schlumberger idea, aka vapid management speak, diving, crashing and burning...when will the idiots at the top ever learn?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pvy+NswNRf9

Post a reply

: