Thread regarding ITT Educational Services Inc. layoffs

Since they did no file for bankruptcy - we should be all entitled to severance under the W.A.R.N. act

Since Modany and his henchmen wish to collect more pay and did not file for bankruptcy all employees are covered under the W.A.R.N. act, as today was clearly a mass layoff that qualifies for application of the W.A.R.N. act, especially since they did not notify us with any advance notice and left all of us hanging over the Labor Day weekend. Plus no severance packages were offered to us, which as per their policy was never waived.

by
| 1441 views | | 13 replies (last September 9, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+JfCoCRs

13 replies (most recent on top)

It was rumored ... The Director of Recruitment at our campus received a $7000 severance before he was let go.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3xjf+JfCoCRs

One can sue and still move on at the same time. It's called multitasking. 😊

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2qod+JfCoCRs

The no severance rule applies only to the executives of he company - not regular staff at the schools.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fpx+JfCoCRs

severance is not leally required, so ITT can just say they don't feel like it right now. You say, "but they have a severance policy" , however ITT can say all their policies state they can be modified at any time at ITT's discretion (or something like that). They usually give it to prevent "bad publicity", but won't help much here.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xvg+JfCoCRs

DOE has prohibited bonuses and severance packages till all financial obligations are met. The top bosses otherwise would approve of these to themselves first!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @obd+JfCoCRs

Ha, joke

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pdz+JfCoCRs

No money available

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @chc+JfCoCRs

Please don't count on it...please move forward, that's as,WARN enough as its going to get...those severance packets should of been ready

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wuj+JfCoCRs

Save your energy and think about your next steps...just sayin

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ond+JfCoCRs

ITT's BS about "unforeseen" won't hold off WARN Act suits if any are filed. They knew in APRIL they had to satisfy ACICS's show-cause. Unfortunately, anyone who prevails will have to stand in line for a corporation with very few unsecured assets.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @twn+JfCoCRs

They closed due to unforseeable circumstances which is an exemption under the WARN Act.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gvv+JfCoCRs

I'm sure they will file a BK soon enough

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mdr+JfCoCRs

Well...go ahead and sue them. Or just move on. It's all irrelevant now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ouu+JfCoCRs

Post a reply

: