Thread regarding Cameron International Corp. layoffs

Any feedback/opinions on the enforceability of the non compete agreement slb is asking Cameron engineers for?

by
| 2751 views | | 5 replies (last July 7, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Ian1dyf

5 replies (most recent on top)

I know of 2 people in a different industry that were taking to court in regards to a non compete. The companies that tried to stop them from making a living in the field they were train in,lost in court. As long as you don't steal confidential informations, drawings and such. That non compete isn't worth the paper it's written on. Also, I am sure different circumstances will be on your side if you are laid off. The courts will not stop you from making a living - call Erik Wade, for clarification. He is the Very best employment attorney in Texas!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6nvp+Ian1dyf

Texas adopted a law 2 years ago that unifies its law with other states. Do a little Google research. It can be enforced in Texas as long as they have a reasonable end to the agreement

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6ipx+Ian1dyf

Most are not enforceable. If you are in a high level position with sensitive or confidential knowledge that could significantly benefit a competitor, that is something else. Of course, those high level people are not being laid off.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2wnv+Ian1dyf

Right to work and the non-compete are two different things. Right to work deals with union membership. Non right to work states require you to join the union. This has nothing to do with that. Keep in mind you are knowingly signing a contract - hence, no one is putting a gun to your head, saying you "understand and agree" to the terms therein. I would seek legal council so you know exactly what you are signing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dec+Ian1dyf

Normally, non compete contracts aren't worth the paper they are written on. Texas is a free to work state. I would before you sign that contract, take it to attorney, always now your rights!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zux+Ian1dyf

Post a reply

: