are we any worse than those guys? I don't think so!
11 replies (most recent on top)
Yes you are worse than those guys, a lot worse actually.
SLB gets their new hires from graduate schools.
HAL gets their new hires from universities.
WFT gets their new hires from prisons.
Move over
SLB and HAL tend to hire a higher calibre employee/manager which costs more than the lower skilled/capability employee that weatherford tend to get on the cheap. We may save some costs in the salaries but the performance of the company has been terrible over the last 10 years or so and paying cheap for sub standard employees equates to lower performance. When will upper management learn???
Why does McDonald's employees get paid more than Burger King...
Over the last couple of years, at SRO, the managers that WFT had been hiring were inexperienced or rejects from Baker Hughes.
"Worked for both SLB and HAL; pay is better at WFT. Environment and company's health is a different story..."
Really! So you were a manager at HAL? That's why you know how much managers at SLB etc. are paid? Right.
just look at your company performance and you see the answer
yes, you are worse than them.
Worked for both SLB and HAL; pay is better at WFT. Environment and company's health is a different story...
Perhaps because they are better managers
I don't know, maybe they haven't run the companies into the ground.