Why are people complaining so much about the lay offs. A bunch of people stuck at the same title for 10 years is not a good asset to any company. Better yet why were these people hired to begin with?
Qualcomm cutting the chaff is a necessity.
16 replies (most recent on top)
I disagree. At some point, a person reaches their limit. If they are happy and very productive when they hit this limit, then they are of great value to the company. If they stay at this same limit for 40 years, they are still of great value.
FU OP
ALL BLACKs = OUT
Cool bro
Conniving indians stay on
AS IF!
Management is lost I do believe they know who is actual doing the work
OP is a tool.
601 is correct the good people always have a place to go, they have left. The dead weight sits and wait for the gtfu notice and then panic, and convince themselves they are fine, and repeat.
OP get your head out of your ass. Good people got cut. That is a factores externos que
In my opinion, the opposite is true. all the kisses asses, those who hide and dont ruffle any feathers were kept and the one that were vocal, innovative, tried to make change got cut. FU OP.
So funny HAHAHA
Cool story bro
the good will go on their on own....only the laggards need to be fire...
actually a lot of top performers have been fired when they decided to close a lot of peripheral offices
Is sucking up and claiming credit part of the criteria for being a "top performer"? How many VPs and directors really do the real work besides relaying the reporting? Are they "top performers"? How is the "top performer" being determined? Just by the whims and preference of the direct supervisor? What if the direct supervisor is from the same village?
I think we should understand by now that work and recognition don't go hand-in-hand. I am curious how the "top performers" who are earning in the millions per year in the higher management has proven their results. There may be something to learn there, then again, maybe not.