Thread regarding Baker Hughes Inc. layoffs

Dragging along

It appears the reason for more time is that Halliburton is not getting the price they want for the product lines they are selling. Also the divestures may add up to more then what was expected. They are going to do whatever it takes to make this deal go through. In the end Halliburton takes it in the shorts.

by
| 451 views | | 5 replies (last July 14, 2015) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+CtxVSc7

5 replies (most recent on top)

All Baker Hughes layoffs have to be OK'ed by the integration team in which HAL controls. Likewise for all BHI hiring or relocation decisions. Random HR actions? You must be kidding or not well connected.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @F3E+CtxVSc7

All Baker Hughes layoffs have to be OK'ed by the integration team in which HAL controls. Likewise for all BHI hiring or relocation decisions. Random HR actions? You must be kidding or not well connected.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @Gi7+CtxVSc7

The layoffs were not random. The layoffs were for people who's managers didn't like them or were a potential threat to the managers own job later on down the line. The Layoffs were essential our managers securing their position for the next 5 years to never be challenged again

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @GHh+CtxVSc7

Yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @NTt+CtxVSc7

Under the current economic crisis, low oil prices against max production rates by some producers. I don't think bidders will give worthy pricing for Baker product lines. Furthermore, Baker random layoffs make most of product lines lose many expertises which will make the value drop more.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bwq+CtxVSc7

Post a reply

: