Thread regarding ConocoPhillips layoffs

COP getting LEAN and MEAN

Looks like they are going to make all BUs independent with no or minimal reporting back and forth to/form houston office... all BUs independent means some people in houston office will be effected plus they are going to trim BUs as much as they can....dont know about the exact number but it can be significant as they have a target in mind to reduce costs by $1bn (that is equal to reducing 5000 employees).

COST Project is actually LAYOFFS Project

The greed of maximizing shareholder's return back in 2012 which resulting in ConocoPhillips spin is now hurting COP without downstream unit its hard to battle this commodity crash....

bad time to be in oil industry

by
| 691 views | | 7 replies (last July 30, 2015) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+CCj3A3G

7 replies (most recent on top)

We do KNOW HOW TO WORK however our hands are tied by people who have no idea what "we" do for a living

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @71Ng+CCj3A3G

Funny - 90% of the people I worked with at COP have no idea how to work, not without an endless list of goddam manuals to guide them through. Wouldn't last 2 weeks at a 'Lean & Mean' independent

Guess we should expect a massive recruiting campaign - have to find people who can actually do real work

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7dIm+CCj3A3G

Chevron uses the independent model. It has its pros and cons. This seems like posturing to me. Not sure for who. Xom is very centralized.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2Lqf+CCj3A3G

121504 - hit it dead on

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3Cz+CCj3A3G

Agreed - internal contact of mine said Houston is eyeing an ultimate reduction to just under 10,000 under the new independent business model. That will lead to a 9,000 staff reduction in the end. There seems to be no sign from any office that security in Bartlesville exists. I know a few supervisors already reducing their offices and informing their 30 member staff that by end of the year they were told it had to be down to 4. October seems to be the flood gate start, with November being a true bloodbath, and wrap up in December with the new face of a company that will suddenly be a small operation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @TzE+CCj3A3G

The independence of the business units is best suited to a for sale sign on each business unit. Polar Tankers, as an example, is a good fit for a for sale sign. The shared services including information technology and finance are good fits for outsourcing with the business unit independence.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @YZQ+CCj3A3G

If we all understand the strategy, it goes something like this:

a. Get rid of the downstream just months before it becomes amazingly profitable, likely the worst decision made in the history of conoco.

b. Keep all the integrated company processes in place so that we suffer from a giant bloated bureaucracy.

c. Under the auspices of collaboration, ask the businesses to work together, but meantime only reward them for beating their peers (thus creating cheating culture).

d. When prices fall, rather than get rid of the low performing production businesses, get rid of technology and exploration. Keep nasty oil sands?

e. Refrain from sharing an actual forward looking strategy because that might distract people from cost cutting.

f. Wait for Exxon, Shell, Total, or Chevron to buy us to fix all the above.

Gee whiz

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @op0+CCj3A3G

Post a reply

: