Thread regarding ConocoPhillips layoffs

EMPLOYEE SELECTION CRITERIA USED TO DETERMINE LAYOFFS -

I wish this was made clear for all employees. I was just told by an existing supervisor that they were all told only poor performers were let go. Not true. Not only not true, but when I was let go HR told me that was just a rumor even though that was what employees were widely told. I know of MANY strong performers whose pay was $100,000+ who were let go! This was also confirmed by EAP and the Unemployment office. Maybe I am vain, but I hate for people to have that mistaken idea about my performance, since I was caught in round one of the Bartlesville layoffs. I was a strong 3, and I don't know any of my peers who were ever given a rating above a 3.

I am of the belief that older, well-paid (grade 15) employees were targeted purely for FINANCIAL reasons. They let go those who were costing the company the most money to be replaced by younger employees who were paid less money. THEN - to avoid the appearance of age discrimination, they let younger, poor performers go.

I think there will be more layoffs following this same pattern. Management is in for a rude awakening. The next generation of employees has different ideas about what it means to be employed by a big oil & gas company. They don't seem to believe overtime is a part of the job, and their personal lives are of the upmost importance. This includes many long breaks, lots of social contacts, a lot of networking, and believe it or not, they all use FACEBOOK at work. When I am near the complex, it looks like a college campus, because there are younger employees walking or standing EVERYWHERE. Work is done INSIDE the buildings, so WHY are they all outside??

Part of this post may just be venting, but I just wish COP would be more OPEN about what they are doing that greatly impacts the lives of those who have dedicated their lives & careers to this company. There's a LOT of missed times with my kids and their sports and school plays that I can't get back.

by
| 1631 views | | 5 replies (last August 23, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+BU8c2RR

5 replies (most recent on top)

Only reason there’s no transparency is because the methods are in fact illegal.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @Aznom+BU8c2RR

I heard the same thing, only "poor performers" were let go. Simply not true and I don't like my name being slung through the mud with former coworkers. It's not right. I can only hope that everyone knows at least person let go that they know for a fact was a good employee to make the reasons given obviously false.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rQss+BU8c2RR

COP executive "leadership" makes the commitment to cut $1 billion in OPEX without having a plan or feasibility assessment. None of the cuts, of course, will come from the executive ranks...not even pay or compensation reductions to "share" the pain of trying to make COP attractive as a takeover target. The company is now led by fools who have no plan...and allow the cliques to determine the culture within each workgroup. Ryan Lance cannot even provide the reduction team with a vision or parameters for achieving the "reorganization". The true "leaders" have been and will be cut in most of the operating groups, because COP is full of managers and supervisors who have no leadership skills or vision. If you are a dynamic presenter of other peoples' ideas, you can b seen as a "visionary". If you enjoy sucking up, your "networking" skills will be recognized and appreciated. COP is a dead man walking scenario...borrowing money to pay bills, closing & selling operations to make payments and increasing production at a loss to achieve cash flow.

Real leaders would take cuts ahead of asking their organization to sacrifice, but such thoughts never occur to hypocrites an managers in name only!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ZPL+BU8c2RR

The employee performance ratings are subjective opinion of unqualified supervisors. And yes HR, Ethics and EAP are in in disbelief of the process at hand. The insights of both past and current employees present opportunities to put the situation in perspective. The future employers understand the process is not based solely on performance and evaluate candidates involved in the layoffs objectively. The departure of the HR VP is a very telling statement to the industry as a whole.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ieS+BU8c2RR

Its ridiculous there is actually a "formula " race pay sex yrs of service and age all included....although in San Juan the ratio of people who are there because they know someone is so high unless you are in a group of 8+ populars you dont matter good work great work if you don't kiss some ass your out!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1TWs+BU8c2RR

Post a reply

: