Yep, Trifacta was a total snow job (from a technical perspective) and it goes to show the quality of the board of directors and previous executive team, that they didn't really bother to do REAL due diligence from a product/technical standpoint.
Sadly, that acquisition brought in some toxic people (as has been discussed here ad nauseum) as well as quite a few "hangers on" who were very content to just collect paychecks, kick back, and not do much.
Prime example of this was the previous "CMO" of Trifacta, who ended up becoming VP of product/portfolio marketing, and honestly after 18 months on the job didn't do squat. He was a smart guy, very articulate, understood marketing and COULD HAVE really made a difference. But he chose not to. He chose to sit back, relax, coast, get some massive paychecks, and then finally got shoved off the island when PE came aboard and found the incompetence of marketing overall, and the lack of action to really do anything. Not 100% his fault, he was enabled by the last Alteryx CMO and the rest of the "marketing executive team" (who as we all know were in over their heads by 1-2 job levels, all of them).
So, yes, Trifacta was a really bad thing in so many ways. It's the fault of the previous exec team and the BoD for allowing that to happen. They could have done much better with a few "tuck in" acquisitions of specific technologies (companies like Hyper Anna) that would have paid much higher dividends.