Or are we too deep in trouble for getting rid of fabs to allow recovery and growth? I’m afraid that we are too far gone. We have no much, if any, maneuvering space even if fabs are gone. We have been in trouble long before taking fabs on, and I’m not sure we have capacity to turn the ship around and catch up with others under any new circumstances.
7 replies (most recent on top)
We were in trouble before taking the fabs on? When did this occur? The fab and manufacturing has always been an integral part of Intel's success and industry lead. It was when the bean counters started letting the fabs go to cr-p (staffing and training) that the demise of Intel began.
Sunk cost fallacy.
Take the L and start over.
OP who will be the buyer?
Now if you can answer that yes yes yes to your question
troll or idi-t
These entitles prickes in DCAi and CCG, wtf have you guys delivered in the last few years that makes you think that if you move to TSMC yoru products will sell like hot cakes?
The only way out of this is filling for chapter 11 and get government protection
Intel is long gone in deep coma and either government protection or pull the plug and have some mercy
I will tell you what - you don’t want to be on fab side of that split. Fab side always gets slammed. Look at every other similar example. The non-fab side explodes in tremendous positive direction while fab side flounders and has additional layoffs etc