They can just stick to layoffs anytime they are in a pickle or don’t want to share profits. It’s simple, right up their alley given the leadership capacity to tackle complex issues, and it provides immediate effects. It’s always a problem in the long-run, but who cares about tomorrow? Reorgs just seem to be too much of a task.
5 replies (most recent on top)
Mike is as greedy as they come. You can't layoffs to longterm success. He did it once and it crippled the company. I guess he wants to finish it off.
It’s fairly well documented and understood that big organizational changes rarely result in positive changes
Our Chevron leaders don’t seem to have learned that lesson. The issue is we have too many leaders who don’t have anything else to show to justify their high PSGs
Regular Orwellian Malevolence
ROM = Reducing Organizational Motivation
ROM = Random Organizational Mess
That's the way most publicly traded companies work. Did you hear about Boeing? It's been 24 years of it for me, chin up as they say :)