Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

Genius Cisco Layoff Strategy (evil but genius nonetheless)

Genius Cisco Layoff Strategy (evil but genius nonetheless)

Cisco ELT has honed this strategy over multiple rounds of firings. Telegraphing the layoff with a leak, creating an excruciating wait, changing PTO policy.

These are all well timed and methodical. The "people deal" is a failure.

Cisco is a dying company. They have missed every major technology cycle since 2002.
Their only value is in legacy networking which they are dismantling with the push to "recurring revenue and software". People buy Cisco to pump packets through boxes, not for AI, Datacenter, Leadership or any other nonsense they spew.

Packets. Boxes.

THe pivot to Splunk, AI and Security is a strategic disaster and they will lose their core customers. why?

the vacuum created by the talent loss. it's simple math. $28 billion spent on non-core stuff creates a situation where in order to remain viable, they have to cannabalize every other part of the business.

Cisco is ripping apart their house to feed the AI fire. sad.

The ELT knows this and is in the process of cashing out. Every current employee who voluntarily leaves during he-l month is gravy for them. Genius.

by
| 3411 views | | 7 replies (last August 23, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1u7JwC3i

7 replies (most recent on top)

We will see I guess. The AI data center explosion is a gift in the lap of Cisco. There's no way we can miss it right? Like only an id--t leadership can sc--w up a $575 billion opportunity between now and 2027. How many people think we can actually pull this off? or will Arista and HP swoop in and steal it.... In Cisco's current state of operation, we will be standing on the sidelines watching everyone else profit

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ktg+1u7JwC3i
Cisco ELT has honed this strategy over multiple rounds [of often quarterly layoffs over more than 23 years] of firings.
They have missed every major technology cycle since 2002 [had to acquire technologies for 30 years because they don't know how to do marketing or development].

FTFY.

$28 billion spent...

Cisco has actually spent well over $100B over 30 years on acquisitions, and as technology becomes more complicated so does the difficultly of integrating and executing with those acquisitions. As long as "leadership" thinks they can triage and bandage their way to the next $50B/yr in revenue Cisco is going nowhere.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1liq+1u7JwC3i

No people don't just buy to pump packets through boxes that is d-mb and shows you have no idea what customer is thinking. I am in wireless and Arista and Mist etc keeps beating us because of the AI features. Customers will come to you and say oh your competitors are offering all that fancy ML stuff, and Cisco keeps losing market share. So AI done right definitely helps bring customers in and make them stay.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ful+1u7JwC3i

This is more desperation than evil or genius. They can’t innovate, they can’t steal, they are finished.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aza+1u7JwC3i

Very well said!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qob+1u7JwC3i

Accurate. I’m sure there is fraud laced throughout this strategy, and more than likely ELT members will be named in forthcoming suits.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lij+1u7JwC3i

This is the exact playbook Nortel used to dismantle their business

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jrj+1u7JwC3i

Post a reply

: