Thread regarding General Motors layoffs

Lots of WARNS soon going out at GM. “GM changes salaried performance and bonus plan to attract top talent, thin poor performers”

The Work From Home Slacking days are officially over at GM. Now it's who all gets a WARN Day.

General Motors is changing its performance rating system for white-collar workers by expanding the performance rating scale, setting better-defined targets and pushing managers to identify a targeted number of their top and bottom performers within their organization.

GM is also adjusting bonus payouts to allow the best performers to earn more than 100% of the company's target bonus.

In an email sent to the global salaried workforce Thursday that was obtained by the Detroit Free Press, GM said it was making these changes to better compete in a increasingly challenging autos market.

"The automotive industry is experiencing a multiyear transformation, and we're seeing new competition enter the market both in the U.S. and abroad," wrote Ken Fendick, head of GM Global Talent. "In order to win as a company, we must continue to evolve so we can meet the challenges ahead. That means setting high standards, holding each other accountable and providing clear expectations when it comes to performance."

GM spokesman Kevin Kelly said the new performance plan is intended to nurture the best talent inside GM and attract top new talent by offering higher performance incentives.

“GM is proud to have a culture where we foster and reward high performance, which will help us attract and retain top talent in a competitive industry environment," Kelly said in a statement to the Free Press. "That includes everything from ensuring employees know what is expected of them, providing feedback so they can develop and rewarding them for their performance."

A new five-point rating system

In the email to the salaried workforce, GM said it is moving from a three-point to a five-point performance rating scale effective for the year-end performance review cycle, which typically starts in November. GM has used the three-point rating for at least the past decade, two people at GM told the Free Press. They asked to not be identified because they are not authorized to speak publicly about this subject.

This means that GM's old performance rating of needs improvement, meets expectations or high-performing, will now change to the following:

Significantly exceeds expectations
Exceeds expectations
Achieves expectations
Partially meets expectations
Does not meet expectations
GM said research shows that many top-performing companies, including banks and Silicon Valley companies, use a five-point system.

As part of the new plan, GM expects each organization's manager to rate 5% of their team as significantly exceeds expectations, 10% as exceeds expectations, 70% achieves expectations, 10% partially meets expectations and 5% who do not meet expectations, the email said.

"This will allow us to recognize those making exceptional business impacts, and effectively manage those failing to drive our business objectives forward," the email read, adding it will hold team leaders to those target objectives, including identifying their bottom 5%.

For the 5% who do not meet expectations, GM wrote, "we expect appropriate action to be taken, up to and including being exited from the company."

This sent shudders through some of the white-collar workforce who view it as a way to reduce headcount, said one of the GM people. But another person familiar with the plan said the organizational targets are not quotas and if a manager rates all of his or her people as "achieves expectations," that is fine. GM's human resources department, however, would push that manager to explain why no one exceeds expectations or no one needs improvement.

The objective is not to reduce headcount, this person said, adding, "The purpose is to provide better definition to the salaried employees on what the expectations are."

Bigger payouts possible

GM is also increasing the financial rewards for those top performers.

The email outlined that employees who significantly exceed expectations will now get 150% of the target bonus; those who exceed expectations get 125%; those who achieve expectations get 100%; those who partially meet expectations get 50%; and those who do not meet expectations get nothing. In the past, managers had discretion to pay more than 100%.

Here's how that works: GM has a formula for determining the target bonus payout. As the Free Press reported in February, starting this year, the automaker will include the performance of electric vehicle sales, software and services, and autonomous vehicle programs in the formula that determines the white-collar workers' payouts. Previously, the formula was solely based on GM's annual earnings before interest and taxes and its free cash flow. Free cash flow is the cash GM makes after accounting for costs to support operations and maintain its capital assets.

So if GM's target bonus, based on that formula, ended up at say, $5,000, then the person who significantly exceeding expectations would get 150%, or a payout of $7,500.

The bonus program for GM's hourly employees is different from that for salaried workers. The hourly profit-sharing plan is based on a negotiated formula with the UAW. It is $1,000 per every $1 billion in annual EBIT, or pretax profits for North America. About 45,000 U.S. hourly workers will receive a profit-sharing check of up to $12,250 for last year, GM reported in January.

GM said in its email that 85% of employees would qualify for the full payout or additional payout, which is expected to be more than previous years, when about 75% to 80% of people hit those targets, one of the people told the Free Press.

"GM needs to have a high-performing culture to succeed and win," the email reads. "Our new performance management rating system will also reinforce our pay-for-performance culture, incentivize top performers, and help clarify expectations and feedback for employees' growth."

by
| 1601 views | | 14 replies (last August 5, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1tOpmtxX

14 replies (most recent on top)

Just a way to spin layoffs as "fired for cause due to poor performance."

And cheat the employees out of severance and unemployment.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3tqv+1tOpmtxX

You know what cures bitch1ng?
Layoffs.
The broken record diatribe about how effective people are and boo hoo the traffic.
The next few years are going to break some of you people.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3yaj+1tOpmtxX

@3mqc+1tOpmtxX
I'm surprised that you still don't get it.
The party is over.
In mere months, people will be begging to work at GM in office 5 days a week.
It will happen and so will the 5 days.
Then what? Are you going to quit? And go where? Good grief. Man up!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3lfb+1tOpmtxX

to the last commenter, yes, we still don't want to come into the office. a good worker is going to be at least, if not more, effective working remotely and a poor worker isn't going to be better just because u hogtied them back in. no one "collaborates" on our team any more while in-person and it appears they're all so annoyed being there with all the distractions that they seem less approachable. i guess it's safe to say the beatings will continue until morale improves lmao

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3mqc+1tOpmtxX

GM stock lost 5% of its value in a single day (friday). I suspect the cuts will need to start soon to appease wall street.
Things are moving fast.
Anyone still feel like complaining about coming into the office?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3aos+1tOpmtxX

Who will be easy targets for the 15%?
Senior staff? No.
Those who aren't showing up are #1.
Those who have been complaining about RTO are #2.
#3 are the obvious people who aren't cutting it for various reasons.
There are more than 15% in my group that fall in these three categories so this will be easy for me.
If you aren't contributing and you are complaining, you know your time is coming.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fhc+1tOpmtxX

Believe me this is also a way to get rid of older higher paid employees. They set people up and lie on performance reviews and there is nothing you can do because HR works for management not employees

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jtc+1tOpmtxX

Either way, senior managers(L8) are now forced to choose which of their team members to put on "the bottom 5%" which they will need to let go before or the end of the 2024. Then the other 10% of their team will be on the Q1 of 2025.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @joz+1tOpmtxX

The issue here is systemic dysfunction. At a tier 1 supplier, proficiency is required because business will be lost immediately if performance is lacking, relative to peer tier 1's. Here certain projects are expected to fail right from the outset. Scapegoats are selected and matched to those known future failures.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eoi+1tOpmtxX

Listen folks, the sky isn’t falling and you’ll be fine. Suppliers have been using this method of rating employees for quite a long time. As always GM is playing catch up.

Having worked at a supplier that did this I’ll say you haven’t much to worry about if you’re a good employee and on top of your responsibilities. Make sure your boss knows what you’re working on so s/he gives appropriate credit and recognizes your value

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bxg+1tOpmtxX

the company was just as profitable during the 3 years most of us worked from home so it's a bit of a reach to say "Work From Home Slacking days". do u really think good employees don't work hard simply because they are in their comfy homes or that bad employees are suddenly productive because they are forced back into the office? none of that is even factoring in the negative factors of: the stress of the commuting, the open office layout where distractions are all around you, overcrowded restrooms, new rating system that pits employees against each other

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zia+1tOpmtxX

"In order to win as a company, we must continue to evolve so we can meet the challenges ahead. That means setting high standards, holding each other accountable and providing clear expectations when it comes to performance."

Will management also be held accountable? Will they have to meet high standards and have clear expectations that they'll have to meet?

"As part of the new plan, GM expects each organization's manager to rate 5% of their team as significantly exceeds expectations, 10% as exceeds expectations, 70% achieves expectations, 10% partially meets expectations and 5% who do not meet expectations, the email said."

So the bottom 5% will be fired, and the 10% above that will be PIPd, and probably fired.

"As the Free Press reported in February, starting this year, the automaker will include the performance of electric vehicle sales, software and services, and autonomous vehicle programs in the formula that determines the white-collar workers' payouts."

So my bonus will depend on the sales of bad EVs and bad AV software at Cruise.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qjf+1tOpmtxX

DEI is still in full effect. By definition, it ensures the best and brightest are passed over in the interest of equal outcomes.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nne+1tOpmtxX

No surprise whatsoever. Just another scheming leadership and HR “performance” tactic, to run out the higher salaried folks and claim that no layoffs are happening. So sad to see what’s been transpiring at GM since early 2023. Better buddy up with your manager and kiss some serious ar-e around there if you want to be viewed favorably moving forward. Those long time loyal GM employees should expect more surprise assignments with unclear direction and goals - setting you up to fail, regardless of past performance. If you’re not a chosen one, they’ll find a way. So glad to have escaped that hyper-toxic environment a couple years back! The grass really is greener (& more sane) elsewhere outside of Detroit automotive, I promise you that!! Good luck to everyone still at GM, “assuming goodness”.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ocz+1tOpmtxX

Post a reply

: