From Chuck's perspective, he personally makes $500 Million+ over 10 years without the added stress of creating shareholder value because of the RSU's. He just needed a few things 1) Mckinsey/Consultants to tell him what he needs to know, sound bites, software/whole offers, etc. that he can feed the investment community and employees 2) EVP leadership team that is not a threat (cannot have a Bates, Giancarlo, Jayshree, MPLS, would challenge too much and no need for Chuck). We also ended up with a weak EVP team that would be lucky to be VP's elsewhere. The EVP's have a goal, if I can stay 10 years, I'll make $200 Million personally.. They need talking points too, and need to ensure SVP's under them that are not a threat. Overall, there's no vision, depth or substance by this EVP team, but they get their big payday regardless of performance.
Last 5 years
Cisco Market Cap -$40B, Arista +$80B, HPE +$12B, JNPR +$3B
If the EVP team was not given RSUs but performance stock options, they might have tried to increase shareholder value vs. destroy it. (or not taken the job to begin with, because they would not get paid)