Terminology regarding “Severance” pay and “Retirement Benefits” are quite different in U.S. Payroll. Focusing upon retirement eligible: Those fortunate enough to be on U.S. Payroll prior to 2010 who are now Grandfathered in on those terms today do very well with their Retirement Benefits. That of course is assuming they contributed more than their 9% match in their 401k where they invested steadily, sensibly and wisely. Combined with the old payroll RIP as part of their retirement benefits, those still around today have done very well in setting themselves up for retirement. If you factor in no destructive debt incurred, and living in Kingdom below their means, they have no worries.
An item which did change for old payroll, and negatively impacted many, because the laws in the U.S. allowed it, and is which is not grandfathered in, was the medical plan. It used to be global being both used in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. and it was lifelong for the employee and spouse. Now, it’s only available until Medicare eligible (65) and frankly not useful outside of the U.S. anymore at a much higher cost.
More profoundly than benefit package changes, which you accept when you onboard here regardless of what others have or had, is the work culture change. Previously, most but not all U.S. payroll employees earned and received a more equitable PMP rating, and a GC promotion opportunity was afforded based upon merit which was not at all uncommon every 5 or 6 years. The combined compounding effect of which was when you look back was incredible and still has a positive effect today. Being employed during that era compared to newly employed today is a paradox and over the long term it has a significant drain on the wealth opportunity within grasp, employee well being, job satisfaction and the attractiveness of the job. When many employees compare what it “was” to that which it “is” it’s a complete paradox.
Those under the old payroll system were also employed during an era of relatively low cost inflation. They also did not have as much “off camp” opportunities for destructive recreational spending and tended to instead be on camp pursuing their recreation where there were much more active and diverse self directed recreational groups to partake in, at low if not no cost for the whole family. Compared to today, it was simply a different era, different lifestyle and different opportunity which will likely never be seen again.