This prize is mostly about the high percentage of employees who decided to participate in the ECP. Basically, the government gives recognition to companies to show that they have implemented a good program for retirement savings.
For me, there was nothing exceptional about how Sabre introduced the ECP. There was some information about what it is, a meeting with an expert from an outside company who explained the rules. However, Sabre only gives the lowest contribution required by law (1.5%), while the ECP allows and encourages companies to give up to 4% (which could be based on years of employment, for example). But Sabre always provides only the bare minimum.
The prize about adoption should go to employees because they are smart. Informing about the program is not really special. An employee, by default, is participating in the ECP unless they resign. So not informing employees about this could even lead to a higher participation rate.
But my post wasn't about that.
It was about the fact that following the law and giving the bare minimum is a part of the employee benefits provided by the company.
And to better illustrate how ridiculous Sabre HR is, you can check the career page on the Sabre website. In job descriptions in Poland, you will find this:
"Employee Capital Plans: profit from a long-term savings scheme co-financed by Sabre and the State Treasury."
It is just following the laws.
But if you think it's okay to include it, you should also include in the benefits in job descriptions:
-
- Salary paid on time
-
- Free access to government hospitals
-
- Ability to return to work after pregnancy
-
- Guarantee of ensuring 11 hours of uninterrupted rest
The last one would be especially a good idea to include because even though employers are required to give 11 hours of uninterrupted rest, Sabre does not always respect this when people have on-call duty.