Thread regarding Sabre Holdings layoffs

Sabre Poland follows laws as part of comprehensive employee benefits for its employees

"We've mentioned this before, but it's worth repeating: Sabre Poland has been honored as a "Responsible and Friendly Employer" in the 7th edition of the program!

Our dedication to incorporating Employee Capital Plans (ECPs) into our comprehensive
employee benefits"

Implementing Employee Capital Plans and offering them to every employee is mandatory for every company, as prescribed by law in Poland!!!

HR (or rather, the People's Team) in Poland is a complete joke.

by
| 2061 views | | 11 replies (last March 13, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1rpmOgeh

11 replies (most recent on top)

If Sabre could eliminate the mainframe then they could finally achieve their goal to fire everyone in the US and move the headquarters to Poland, India, or wherever.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7epl+1rpmOgeh

Yippee for the Pollacks

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7kya+1rpmOgeh

I guess that's one reason not to offshore all the Sabre jobs. Sabre pays a bit more to get US workers with less rights. Same as how with contractors you pay more for almost no rights.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4jrz+1rpmOgeh

The US labor laws su-k compared to Poland!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3its+1rpmOgeh

"Guarantee of ensuring 11 hours of uninterrupted rest"

Wow. Cushy. In the US we do what needs to be done, whatever it takes, and if you don't like that then you can quit or be fired. We also don't get paid overtime in the US.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3hpf+1rpmOgeh

Imagine you're interviewing for a job, and you mention during the interview, "I don't think alcohol in the office" as if it's a noteworthy point (drinking alcohol in the workplace is illegal in Poland).

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2jnj+1rpmOgeh

Ex-Sabre Poland here.
What the heck is this about?
I don't understand the purpose of this thread.
What do you want to say?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2qls+1rpmOgeh

This prize is mostly about the high percentage of employees who decided to participate in the ECP. Basically, the government gives recognition to companies to show that they have implemented a good program for retirement savings.

For me, there was nothing exceptional about how Sabre introduced the ECP. There was some information about what it is, a meeting with an expert from an outside company who explained the rules. However, Sabre only gives the lowest contribution required by law (1.5%), while the ECP allows and encourages companies to give up to 4% (which could be based on years of employment, for example). But Sabre always provides only the bare minimum.

The prize about adoption should go to employees because they are smart. Informing about the program is not really special. An employee, by default, is participating in the ECP unless they resign. So not informing employees about this could even lead to a higher participation rate.

But my post wasn't about that.

It was about the fact that following the law and giving the bare minimum is a part of the employee benefits provided by the company.

And to better illustrate how ridiculous Sabre HR is, you can check the career page on the Sabre website. In job descriptions in Poland, you will find this:

"Employee Capital Plans: profit from a long-term savings scheme co-financed by Sabre and the State Treasury."

It is just following the laws.

But if you think it's okay to include it, you should also include in the benefits in job descriptions:

  • - Salary paid on time
  • - Free access to government hospitals
  • - Ability to return to work after pregnancy
  • - Guarantee of ensuring 11 hours of uninterrupted rest

The last one would be especially a good idea to include because even though employers are required to give 11 hours of uninterrupted rest, Sabre does not always respect this when people have on-call duty.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yte+1rpmOgeh

I suggest first reading and understanding the purpose and rules of the OiPP program (https://www.mojeppk.pl/dla-pracodawcy/odpowiedzialny-pracodawca.html), rather than starting with mocking. The program does not reward companies that simply fulfill their obligations but those that actively engage in the implementation process and can provide evidence of their involvement. Personally, I believe that the implementation of the Employee Capital Plans (PPK) at Sabre was done very well, and as an employee, I was well informed about the consequences and how to opt out. Everyone may have a different opinion on this matter, but certainly, implementing PPK should not be equated with receiving recognition from OiPP. Any doubts should be directed to the organizers of OiPP rather than making a mountain out of a molehill. End of discussion.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hgl+1rpmOgeh

The full post:
+---
| We've mentioned this before, but it's worth repeating: Sabre Poland has been
| honored as a "Responsible and Friendly Employer" in the 7th edition of the program!
|
| Our dedication to incorporating Employee Capital Plans (ECPs) into our comprehensive
| employee benefits, along with achieving high participation rates, has earned us
| this recognition. You can delve deeper into our commitment by listening to our own
| Anna Stach, Director People Business Partner, and Tomasz Przybylik,
| VP Software Engineering, both members of the Sabre Poland board,
| in this insightful video https://lnkd.in/dWi84kBn.
|
| We are proud of this achievement and extend our gratitude to
| the Pracownicze Plany Kapitałowe program for this distinction!"
+---

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zol+1rpmOgeh

Polish law:
+----
| Art. 106. [Failure to fulfill the obligation to conclude a PPK management agreement]
|
| Anyone who, as an employer or a person authorized to act on behalf of the employer,
| fails to fulfill the obligation to conclude a PPK management agreement within the period
| specified by the regulations, shall be subject to a fine of up to 1.5% of the remuneration
| fund at the given employing entity for the financial year preceding the commission
| of the prohibited act.
|
|
| Art. 107. [Failure to fulfill the obligation to conclude an agreement on managing PPK,
| making contributions to PPK, reporting required data, and keeping documentation |related to calculating contributions to PPK]
|
| Anyone who, as an employer or a person authorized to act on behalf of the employer:
|
| - fails to fulfill the obligation to conclude, on behalf of and for the benefit
| of the employee, an agreement on managing PPK within the specified period,
| - fails to fulfill the obligation to make contributions to PPK within the period
| specified by the regulations,
| - fails to report the data required by the law or reports false data, or provides
| false explanations in these matters or refuses to provide them,
| - fails to keep documentation related to calculating contributions to PPK,
|
| shall be subject to a fine ranging from 1000 PLN to 1,000,000 PLN (250,000 USD).
+---

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fbv+1rpmOgeh

Post a reply

: