Have you heard what the target merit increase percentage is? Haven't heard anything on those. We were all told 73% of bonuses, but I have heard of 2 people receiving 90% of the bonus. Good luck everyone!
28 replies (most recent on top)
I’m from an area/neighborhood that considers me “a success story” because I got out.
The more I read, the more I think about this:
You can take the girl outta the hood, but you can’t take the hood outta the girl
Is anyone able to share the ABO for the following levels:
57
58
58PL
59
59PL
There’s a few people who are afraid to post so I’m doing it. I can’t find pay band doc
Thanks if you’re able to help
That's the start. Now do why FY 23 numbers were low and answer why the EC took significant bonuses and raises.
Fiscal year 2023 q2, q3, and q4 numbers should be all you need to look at to understand the bonus pool.
Sorry, bonus pool is at 73% so that those let go could get a bonus. Schwab historically let go of people so they weren’t bonus eligible. Otherwise those that remain would likely be getting a bonus funding pool upwards of 80 or 85%… or date ai dream 90%. So we all got sc--wed.
Don’t think that’s right. Retirees, RIFs and others have always been 100% of the pool if eligible. That Boston took so long to follow the directions from otherwise impotent officers while acting like it was completely Boston’s analysis doesn’t change eligibility.
Look at it this way. It is less than $3000 across 2,200 people. Or, you know, the EC bonuses.
Here’s my understanding of what that bonus message means to laid-off employees. Your bonus formula (before taxes) is:
(ABO * 0.7296 * 0.9 * 10/12) - (quarterly bonuses paid in 2023)
For the after tax amount multiply the above by roughly 0.78 if you assume 22% going in taxes.
So if your ABO is $10k, you will get:
Before taxes:
($10k * 0.7296 * 0.9 * 10/12) - (3*quarterly advance)
If you got $500 each quarter, your total bonus before tax is: $3,972.
After deducting 22% in taxes: $3,098.
I’m not happy about this given that the job market su-ks, but it’s something and I’m not going to waste my energy being upset that they sc--wed employees over.
There is no fairness, I did not work 2 months last year to tale a vacation, we were let go and dealing with sh-t load of stuff we were not supposed to deal with in the first place, it is a cheap shot but again, goes well with a cr-ppy culture and a cr-ppy company, fairness would be less bonus and package for EC, guess what, they do sh-t and they got every single penny they could allocate to themselves.
They sc--wed us again for 10%, my mid year review was exceed! it is not our fault we did not work the last two months of the year, sc--w Schwab, seriously!
Agree with this. Today's letter from HR was the first I learned that the bonus would be pro-rated to 90% (of 73%) for those RIF'ed in October. I understand these "fairness" arguments, but this "surprise" does add another "nail to the coffin" of broken trust and transparency in the employee relationship. Once this bonus check is in the bank, I will seriously consider moving all my retirement assets (in Millions) elsewhere.
Laidoff = prorata (10/12 months) * 73% *90% - what's already given.
Sorry, bonus pool is at 73% so that those let go could get a bonus. Schwab historically let go of people so they weren’t bonus eligible. Otherwise those that remain would likely be getting a bonus funding pool upwards of 80 or 85%… or date ai dream 90%. So we all got sc--wed.
- a MD
They sc--wed us again for 10%, my mid year review was exceed! it is not our fault we did not work the last two months of the year, sc--w Schwab, seriously!
$ of individual funding (pro-rata average bonus opportunity % * base pay)
* 90% Individual Bonus Allocation
* 72.96% Corporate Bonus Plan funding
In other words those let go are sc--wed over one last time. (This was forwarded to me)
Historically it is 100% for those let go as there’s no way to provide a review, esp when the manager is also gone.
Nice for the company to remind us all what sc-m puppies they are.
For RIFs, the letter says they are prorating the ABO. So you have to calculate your ABO based on only 10 months and then do the 90% of 72.96%. Therefore on an annual basis RIFs are getting less than 90%.
@djx+1rh6Ovek
While math is correct, the labels you use are slightly off.
73% is the pool fund. You can get 100% +/- 10 % of that based on individual performance. I was RIF-ed and getting 90% of the 73%. If that's the case with all October RIFs, the current employees will be getting more towards 100% of the 73% funded pool. I think it is a fair deal given I didn't work last 2 months there.
Looks like RIF or still employed, Bonus pool is funded at 90% and then release 73% to you, I believe this is applicable to all employees and laid off employees.
I am part of the October RIFs. Got an HR email today that the bonus will be 90% of the 73% minus the quarterly advances. Assuming this is not a one off, it adds up to 65.5% of the whole bonus minus the advances.
While it is a welcomed amount, it is a disappointment given all the hard work i put into the co last year.
I can only guess that will be even harder pill to swallow if you still work there.
Good luck to us all.
What a terribly mean comment. Not "Schwab-nice" imo.
Just received my review. Absolutely floored. I received an IME which was a complete surprise. My Director has skipped most of our one-on-ones and when I asked for feedback, I received generalities without examples. Less than 50% of the bonus target. I guess this is what quiet firing is all about? Thanks, Simon.
Sorry. Shake yourself off and do the following.
Read this post https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1qYvdE1B
After an honest assessment, write a response and ask for it to be added to your HR record. You do not need to include Simon or your chain.
The reponse should note the lack of feedback.
Start recording every 1:1 and interaction. Ask specific questions about work as it sounds like you have.
Consider an attorney.
Constructive discharge, which is what this is if the review is meritless, is generally not enough for wrongful termination. The law favors corporations who pay lots in lobbying money.
But, constructive discharge along with a protected class, stress, harassment and other factors can get to a settlement or successful arbitration/litigation. (Arbitration is likely your path, but that strongly favors companies)
Good luck. I guarantee you aren’t the only one.
Dishonorable bullies lacking professionalism and talent should not do this to good people. It’s become sport to them. Don’t make it easy and do not stress! Absent real documentation they will not terminate without cause. They may pull bonuses and raises, and they will look for little things to help them. Writing HR helps balance that out as they’ll know you’re not weak. Lastly, you aren’t asking HR to change or intervene as they don’t. They have policy that reviews are not modified once the manager submits. HR doesn’t change them and the manager, while they could, already got this approved by the department head (Simon) if it wasn’t actively prepared by him.
I’ve watched this from the sidelines for years and will be leaving next month. Wish I could do more. It gives them what they want, but the only winning move is not to play.
When you say 90% is typical of target, are you saying it is 90% of 100% or 90% of 73%?
What a twisted way of putting things if the latter.
@cec+1rh6Ovek, you might be spending too much time on the layoff
IME = inconsistency met expectations. Definitely a bi--h move if they did it without warning.
What is IME?
Just received my review. Absolutely floored. I received an IME which was a complete surprise. My Director has skipped most of our one-on-ones and when I asked for feedback, I received generalities without examples. Less than 50% of the bonus target. I guess this is what quiet firing is all about? Thanks, Simon.
I honestly hope they do offshore most of this. It's become a joke.
Typical is 90% of target. Exceeds may get you 110% of target.
$13,500 of $15,000 for one, other was “90%” so assume the same, both
By Renee’s bedazzled employee meat tenderizer, you’ve hit the magic number.
I think OP means 90% of the 73%, everyone needs to remember this is performance based.
Please elaborate. They got 90% of the 73% or of 100% target? And why?