Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

Boeing's CEO shakeup and GE's collapse are two more black eyes for Jack Welch's legacy Today's Takeaway is by Allan Sloan


You have to love the irony of it.

This week, Dave Calhoun, an acolyte of the late Jack Welch, the legendary longtime chief executive of General Electric, said he was quitting as chief executive of Boeing, joining the list of unsuccessful Welch disciple CEOs.

And Welch’s legacy will disappear when General Electric’s name vanishes from the list of publicly traded US stocks on Tuesday. That’s when GE, which spun off GE HealthCare last year, will split itself into GE Vernova and GE Aerospace.

The combination of Calhoun quitting, the end of the conglomerate, and General Electric’s name disappearing tells us a lot about how the world has changed since Welch was worshiped by the likes of Fortune Magazine (which named him the Manager of the Century in 1999) and the Financial Times (which named GE “The World’s Most Respected Company” for the third straight year in 2000, the year before Welch stepped down as CEO).

I wrote about the end of Welch’s legacy last year after Larry Culp, who became GE’s CEO in 2018, announced plans to split the company into three pieces, none of which would be named General Electric. As the Welch hagiography died down, the mess left behind showed that his genius was as much in playing accounting games as anything else.

Culp, the first GE chief executive who hadn’t been a company employee, succeeded two Welsh acolytes in the position: John Flannery, who lasted 14 disastrous months, and Jeff Immelt, Welch’s chosen successor, who had lasted for 16 less-than-mediocre years before that.

After I finished laughing at the irony of Dave Calhoun stepping down the week before the name General Electric vanishes from the markets, I decided this would be a good time to compile a list of unsuccessful CEOs who were Jack Welch mentees.

I had no idea that the list would be so long.

I combined my knowledge from decades of writing about business with additional research, then read a 2022 book about Welch written by David Gelles, a New York Times journalist. The title says it all: "The Man Who Broke Capitalism: How Jack Welch Gutted the Heartland and Crushed the Soul of Corporate America — and How to Undo His Legacy."

Between my work and Gelles’s book, I ended up with a list of 13 unsuccessful CEOs who had been Welsh followers. To show that the world isn’t totally black and white, I also included four successful Welsh acolyte CEOs.

What surprised me about the list is that no fewer than four of the 13 had been CEOs of the same company: Boeing. I have no idea why that is. I was also surprised to see that three of the 13 got two shots at being CEOs and all three went 0 for 2.

In fairness, you can see why so many boards of so many companies were eager to hire Welchies as CEOs. Jack Welch was a megasuccessful CEO — or, at least, he seemed to be. GE’s stock rose 5,600% during his 20-year tenure, which was eight times the S&P 500’s 700% rise. (I’m not including dividends in either of those numbers).

Welch was also enormously respected by wide swaths of the business community and society at large, and for a while, GE was the US’s most valuable company, with its stock worth $600 billion.

After Welch retired from GE, it became clear that the company had been playing earnings and accounting games that were made possible by the dozens of acquisitions that Welch made and by the fact that he’d built GE’s finance subsidiary into a gigantic operation. Financial assets allow far more flexibility than manufacturing does when it comes to reporting gains and losses.

There’s lots that we can learn from the Terrible 13 Welch followers who were unsuccessful CEOs. The biggest thing is that what seemed to work for Welch — “ranking and yanking” by firing the bottom 10% of employees every year, playing endless accounting games to make quarterly earnings goals, not thinking long-term — is no way to run a company.

by
| 1088 views | | 5 replies (last March 31, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1rMRsTjU

5 replies (most recent on top)

Culp ruined GE. Made it into three single market companies. Needed to tell Walk St. to pound salt and didn’t have the ba//$.

The only hope for Boeing is Mulally. Anyone else is another round of Calhoun

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2jjq+1rMRsTjU

Ironic that Jack Welch wrote the book "Winning"... Recall all the times DW quoted that term during his initial tenure.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ebm+1rMRsTjU

Welch and his A$$ su-king minions ("Proteges") were snake oil salesmen that were held up not only as heroes, but Gods. They not only ruined GE, but continue to ruin other companies, that they are "leading" today.

Allan Sloan's article finally pointed out what I have always believed: When you worship at the altar of these false Gods, you will eventually be sc--wed!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xej+1rMRsTjU

OP this is exactly what Darren and Kathy are doing to XOM. They're following Welch's recipe. In the short term the stock price will keep rising not because XOM's done anything special but because they've laid off, pushed out, PIPed so many good employees to reduce costs, delayed maintenance to the limit where we're starting to have fires in the plants like the one in France, shut down or sold facilities for no good reason, and took advantage of the war in Ukraine, the instability created by China-Taiwan and the war in Gaza. So, in Exxon everything's just smoke and mirrors. Nothing's real. In the short term yes the stock will keep rising in price and the investors will love Darren and Kathy but in the medium to long term Exxon will end up exactly as GE bankrupt and sold by pieces. Typical of CEOs with poor vision

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zvf+1rMRsTjU

The stockholders loved Jack Welch during his time as a CEO. Jack's short term gains made GE the darling of Wall Street.

The CEO's after Jack Welch's legacy were not able to steer GE in the long term direction to continue the short term Jack Welch gains.

As one ExxonMobil employee stated, "It is better to be a stockholder than an employee. Stockholders are treated much better than employees."

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sbr+1rMRsTjU

Post a reply

: