Thread regarding Saudi Aramco layoffs

Another year, another ‘E’

Surprise, surprise, E is for Expat. Again.

Different excuse made by management this time, apparently nobody got above an E in the team! I find that hard to believe! Guess it’s easier to be dishonest than admit the system is corrupt.

by
| 1141 views | | 5 replies (last February 18, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1qXcyIOz

5 replies (most recent on top)

You said it, not me.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bihk+1qXcyIOz

@1yad+1qXcyIOz

Speak for yourself. I practically run my department, I do the work of two dozen locals. Perhaps I am a fool.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @byps+1qXcyIOz

Be happy with an E. I'm not sure if we do anything anymore that would be worthy of an E+ or an S.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yad+1qXcyIOz

The PMP process is what 'they' want it to be. And yes, congrats on your E.
I also always got the E but was denied my last GC bump because I was within 5 years of retirement.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kjb+1qXcyIOz

"Performance-based" appraisal systems are all "corrupt" around the world.

The PMP system is what it is. S for Saudi because they are destined for promotion, M for Expats because they met the performance requirements for remaining employed. E was.for Expats destined for promotion.

Then when layoffs were included in the annual manpower planning, M meant you were placed on the layoff list, E was for not on the layoff list, and E+ meant potential promotion candidate.

Congrats on not getting an M.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ebs+1qXcyIOz

Post a reply

: