Not expecting anything significant given the meager 73% announced for those currently employed, but humor me.
6 replies (most recent on top)
Between what came out from the advances last year, taxes, and at best getting 73%, that chunk of change won’t be as chunky as you are gleefully promoting. Also, I don't think your average laid-off employee was making 250k, I know I sure as he-l wasn’t.
Why is 73% considered meager? Sure it's, not 100% or 150% funding, but that's a chunk of change. Depending on your grade level, you have a target bonus of 10%, 15%, 20%. Many make as much as $250K base. Do the math. That works out to $250K * .2 * .73 = $36K. It's not $50K, but isn't meager either.
You couldn’t be more wrong about low performers being laid off! It used to be that way. Not this time. Many high performers lost their jobs and I mean high performers! Maybe it was age or salary or who knows what but this was not a regular layoff.
100%.... Definitely not. By nature of a layoff or role elimination lower performers would naturally be on the cut line for most. Not overseeing many high performaners who were let go due to reduction in focus on their area. In other words. I sincerely hope they do not receive the 73% given a met expectations is likely to receive a 65%
100%
It has been 100% in previous layoffs, so 73% of your full target. There are no adjustments for performance.