Thread regarding Charles Schwab Corp. layoffs

“Mostly” non client facing

What client facing positions would they eliminate?

Would certain branches be safer than others due to branch asset size?

by
| 1551 views | | 3 replies (last September 29, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1oQJcvzA

3 replies (most recent on top)

They own the STL buildings

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tvf+1oQJcvzA

I wouldn’t take anything the hill says any more as truth..

Said offices were closing, then opted to keep Missouri open? Sure rent might be cheap there but out of all the closures that’s the one to keep?

Wherever there is redundancy or a way to save cash that’s where it’s gonna happen. Regardless of where your role sits, it’s time to start looking. Layoffs and a reorg only means pain, and it’s going to hurt for awhile

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pdc+1oQJcvzA

Branches aren't safer based on asset size alone. Foot traffic, rent costs, and location matter significantly more.

Say goodbye to high cost downtown branches in NYC, SF, etc. The expanded rme realignment will be consolidated back down along with abm and bm reductions. Nothing is ever truly non-client-facing only.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fit+1oQJcvzA

Post a reply

: