Information Security leadership is in a bad place. The only useful Director left the company this week. In a showcase this week, the first line leaders were awful and did not understand their own teams and how their work affects the business landscape. Product Owners did a better job than the majority of managers.
7 replies (most recent on top)
Director KH appears to have put on over 100 pounds
We can’t offshore fast enough! Allstate figured this out before we did.
"Leadership" is a joke. KF and BS don't have a vision to articulate, just that things need to look new and be done differently. This intellectual laziness then hits directors (most of whom have little to no hands on IS experience) who flail around and then have their managers running fool's errands. Morale is in the pits. Plus, IRM, errr, ITRM, I mean OPF is an ineffective shipshow that makes Governance and the department look foolish. The place is hopeless and miserable.
It’s bad that AA is allowed to walk out the door while the rest of these schmucks are retained.
So what does this mean for the employees and agents? Will the systems start crashing more often? Higher chances of viruses hitting the systems?
Anyone that thinks the AWS security structure and process is good or safe or good for anyone is no cybersecurity guru. No one is ever held accountable
Totally agree with your write up. CM, BB, and MM were exceptionally bad. They do not understand their own teams or the work being done! Let’s have them “lead” teams because they sit down to p-e so we can be diverse.