Earlier there used to be 4 levels of meeting expectations in performance assessment. They changed that to binary now and 5% need to be given off track. Is this to push them into PIP and layoff more people
6 replies (most recent on top)
OP should join to protest corruptions here soon. No need to performance review at corrupted institutions
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mZ2K1xViec
I don't believe OP isn't Off Track.
First line managers have been pressured to give a certain amount of bad rankings in the hopes people will leave without needing severance and Lipton can achieve his headcount target.
Its all about politics and depend if your manager like you or not.
Nothing about performance.
If you gave your manager bad MFT, he will kick you out thru OFF TRACK....
Its always like that in ISRAEL
I guess mid year off track only needed to build BE case end of year
No, 5% has anyways been typical for "below expectations".
But that, however, erases the "outperformers", since there's no way to tell difference between them and the rest.
Which means less or no promotions.