If productivity was so down and performance nose dived due to WFH workers....why were they kept this long?
Why are there so many WFH worked around still? The company could have easily fired them and get new people instead of letting things get this bad and doing layoffs, no?
The reality that you fools don't realize is that the LT knows it's their bs that has led to this. It's not the individual contributors and the middle managers who are trying their hardest to get the job done. It's their failed bets on stupid sh-t like DEI, d-mb acquisitions, recalls, warning letters, quality issues, component backorders, stock buybacks, complete and utter lack of innovation, incompetence at the ExCom level (Que, Torod, Austin, Sally, etc)...
These above are the reasons this company is failing. Not because of some WFH people.
Again I ask...why are they still around if their productivity was so poor? Uh....maybe cause it wasn't poor at all.
Now come at me with your WFH complaints boomers