Thread regarding AIG (American Intl Group Inc.) layoffs

Above and Beyond and less than target STI?

Anyone get rated Above and Beyond and receive less than target STI this go around? Kind of disincentivizes anyone to work hard

by
| 3131 views | | 18 replies (last February 25, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1ljxDqVg

18 replies (most recent on top)

Warning to those saying they got 135% for fully met, etc. I got those a couple of years in a row too, but it won't last. Last two years all of us "top performers" got piddly 2% merit increase and 85 to 100% of STI..when we worked even harder because they won't replace anyone who left. In other words..don't let it go to your head. It can and will change and it won't have been anything you did that caused it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3rkg+1ljxDqVg

I got Above and Beyond and got less than target, same % as others who were rated as “Meets”. 😡

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ojw+1ljxDqVg

My group (we are downtown) got 110%.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2uit+1ljxDqVg

Most i spoke to have CRBG 85% to 95%, AIG 108% to 122%

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2zsp+1ljxDqVg

Unless you report to someone very high in the organization, the person delivering the message is rarely in control of the payout.

If you hear "it isn't you" your manager likely recommended a Higher amount that was reduced at broader levels to balance the pool.

Your manager was tasked to deliver a message that was not what your manager expected or wanted either.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2mhz+1ljxDqVg

Fully met and got 86%, along with the typical response of it wasn't you or your performance. So tired of the it's me not you conversation. Management needs new BS responses to feed to everyone. I really don't know why I stay anymore.

Seems like they want more to leave and this site is building traction among the CRBG folks. All the executives want are people who say yes and don't ask any questions.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2gft+1ljxDqVg

Got 135% with fully met

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2zyo+1ljxDqVg

Not everyone at CRBG got 85%; however, some entire groups did.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dbu+1ljxDqVg

Grass isn’t always greener elsewhere, but AIG has set a low bar to incentivize more of us to leave. We will see if people vote with their feet and whether contractors can run technology. I have my doubts.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cdz+1ljxDqVg

My Corebridge boss said every one recvd 85%...I'm a rebadged employee at Accenture and apparently I'm going to get the full 100% for 2022. I negotiated a 2nd offer with Accenture for a 14% raise so planning to see how it goes.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nyi+1ljxDqVg

Yup, got less this year. More comp time coming up!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1low+1ljxDqVg

I got 120%

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rkn+1ljxDqVg

If true, such BS
Pirate Pete gets a 5 year contract for $50,000,000.00 and we, the employees get Sh on

Pay backs can be a bi--h

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mrn+1ljxDqVg

Never work nights and weekends. Regardless of "urgency" if someone can send it to you at 5 pm on Friday. It can wait till the next business day.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lnn+1ljxDqVg

Given the volatility in financial markets last year, I 100% can see the STI pool being funded less than target, but I don’t see how the STI philosophy can be one where almost everyone gets the same allocation percentage, especially in a year when so many people worked their @sses off for the IPO and post IPO work. Just a giant slap in the face.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eka+1ljxDqVg

Everyone seemed to get about 86% or so of target - not a happy team.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mdq+1ljxDqVg

Yep, seems like everyone in my team got the same percentage, regardless of the rating

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hjh+1ljxDqVg

Makes all of those nights and weekends spent working seem like a waste

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sui+1ljxDqVg

Post a reply

: