Imagine a canonical CEO of a canonical software company.
It does not spend effort maintaining its internal infrastructure.
Many things are crumbling.
Many things are needlessly complicated, and getting worse.
The CEO approves working on up-and-coming architectures.
But does not fund working on new architectures.
The CEO enables the worst brain-fl-------e of the the worst 'tech
leadership' who have an agenda, but no big picture. So, more change
for change sake, but the change is not fixing anything.
The CEO announced work to investigate using Copilot for product
development.
Is the CEO competent? Qualified?