Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

How is the I&D push going to change XOM and other companies?

I&D is ok when companies are making lots and lots of money and can hire three "diversity" employees and then hire three qualified employees to do the job that the "diversity" employees can't do, but what happens when that same company isn't making as much money and has to reduce headcount? Who do they get rid of - the people actually doing the work or the "diversity" hires? Get rid of the people actually doing the work and then you have to have the remaining qualified employees doing the work of two "diversity" hires until they quit and go to another company, likely your competitor.

Remember to chant the phrase. "Diversity makes us stronger" - no, it makes our competitors stronger.

In your next meeting about hiring say, "We need to hire the most qualified people" and you will be called a racist homophobe by the people who are the actual racist homophobes.

by
| 2451 views | | 21 replies (last January 11, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kkfHkoo

21 replies (most recent on top)

We used to be a meritocracy. I think most people would be ok with "some" diversity initiatives to help members of historically disadvantaged groups - however, these days it's almost impossible for a non-diversity employee to be well ranked. HR controls the ranking process these days and "reserves" the top two quintiles almost entirely for diversity employees. It's just blatant racism and s-xism in reverse. Fertile ground for a lawsuit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jjeb+1kkfHkoo

What a d-mb post. Smart and stupid people come in all shape, forms and colors... XOM hires a mix of smart and d-mb people regardless of s-x, colours or races. But this post is 100% stupid

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5hhr+1kkfHkoo

And there you have it folks. Proof positive Hipo’s aren’t the sharpest tools in the shed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4qvi+1kkfHkoo

Part of the diversity bucket worked very hard to overcome challenges and beat those privileged individuals whose parents paid for their schooling.

Just saying not all the 3.3 % can be assumed to be that great.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4nbc+1kkfHkoo

Ima. Female so fall into your diversity bucket. I’ve been with the company a little over 12 years and came from absolutely nothing. I grew up in a trailer park, I ate subsidizes lunches, I took out crazy student loans, but I’ve always been a top quintile worker and a HiPo. Stop putting all diversity candidates in the same bucket. Someone who came from nothing is more likely work their a-s off than someone who was brown with a silver spoon in their mouth and feels entitled to every little thing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4jsa+1kkfHkoo

US engineering college demographics are 3.3% blacks.

EM effort to achieve far great than 3.3 means that in general every interviewee of that 3.3 are offered a job.

What are the chances that the 3.3% black engineering students are all top quintile?

Alternatively, the other 96.7% of students fight over the remaining half of available offers, so by default likely higher performers.

Not racism, just mathematical reality.

To build the best team, must go on performance criteria for recruiting, not an effort to make a diverse team photo.

Just think NBA going on a little person representation effort and recruiting 10% mid-ets. Winning at diversity not always builds a championship team.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4cyf+1kkfHkoo

The blatant racism and misogyny in this conversation is disturbing. People of every race, creed, and color are equally capable of making either good or bad decisions. No single group had a monopoly on being “qualified”. Who was running the corporation in 2019 when we were $70 billion in debt? Huh?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4qfs+1kkfHkoo

“Woke” is a term used nowadays by losers who feel the world has passed them by. They’re not wrong.

These people are so incredibly lame and getting trapped in a convo with them is painful. I wish people had a woke counter on their foreheads for every time they used the term, it would make life so much better to be able to avoid them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ikr+1kkfHkoo

ExxonMobil’s woke culture started traveling down the Hershey highway years ago with no regard for competence.

The only people wanting a diverse culture are the diverse culture people looking for an advantage they can’t get in their own.

Complain all you want but this country wasn’t built on diversity alone but on rewarding those that are the best and working the hardest. Capitalize doesn’t recognize woke diversity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3lca+1kkfHkoo

Nepotism? In Annandale? Color me shocked.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2frs+1kkfHkoo

So we are all tired of the same old nepotism with our current leadership but toss in diversity and this is an issue? I know, I know all the non-racists are saying hire the competent minorities. Exactly, how do you do that in the interview process?

And I'm a straight white male.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2pdg+1kkfHkoo

If you’re a kid of a department head in Annandale and not the best candidate your in! Place is a joke 🤡

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1uqy+1kkfHkoo

It seems EM is trying to achieve a diverse workforce from a non diverse candidate pool.

Engineering students in US are 3.3% black. Assume students interviewed are same. How can EM hold all recruits to same high standard and achieve more than 3.3 % black recruits without any bias or quotas?

Asking for a friend.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ayz+1kkfHkoo

Hilarious!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hfj+1kkfHkoo

@OP I can’t imagine why anyone would think that EM is full of racists and homophobes. I mean, it’s not like they all congregate on some online forum and constantly complain about diversity or anything…..

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1iaq+1kkfHkoo

Nobody who is employable elsewhere wants to work for Exxon, and nobody currently working for Exxon is employable anywhere else.

Lethargy, mediocrity, complacency, and entitlement are the primary characteristics of Exxon employees, and all hold independently of race, gender, or se-ual orientation.

This renders the complaints about diversity moot.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1emu+1kkfHkoo

Anybody can be a narcissist.
HiPos in EM are basically that.
And a good handicap. Golf, that is.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zpp+1kkfHkoo

Again it boils down to a management problem. I don’t think folks are racist but these clown managers hire the first warm body that’s diverse and competence has nothing to do with the choice. Where folks get aggravated is when they can’t learn or don’t want to learn. That is the issue. There are only 2 races. The decent people and the ones that aren’t decent. Hire qualified folks and the issues go away.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1waw+1kkfHkoo

It’s not XOM related but I flew on United to Midland a few weeks back and they had a full page on how they’re “investing” in the future and aim to have 50% of their future pilots be non-white males. What a bloody sham, better to be woke and diverse than have competent pilots who literally have hundreds of lives in their hands!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kqg+1kkfHkoo

I would argue that even during good times (ie when the company is making lots of dough), hiring unqualified candidates because they are diverse is I’ll advised. Instead of 3 diversity hires and 3 qualified (to use OPs example), the company would likely do much better if only the 3 qualified candidates were hired, and salaries that would have went to the 3 diversity hires that do nothing is used to pay bonuses to the 3 candidates that end up being hired. This will significantly improve employee morale, which will yield increased productivity from employees… not to mention it would help from an employee retention standpoint. Educated people leave when they are being compensated less because the company decides to allocate that money towards diversity hires that are incapable of doing their jobs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @inj+1kkfHkoo

Tell me you’re racist by telling me you’re racist.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lfk+1kkfHkoo

Post a reply

: