Thread regarding US Foods layoffs

See something, say something email

He-l no! I don’t know where the first post went that was sent on the email but we will not do that until the ethical topics described on that post caused by executives are reported and there are consequences. We damn sure won’t tell that colonel sanders fraud or any of his team or him resources where he operates!


by
| 4901 views | | 40 replies (last May 14) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kbqkwmxd

40 replies (most recent on top)

No fu--ing way. We don’t fu--ing trust him and his henchmen. We only trust John.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pqn+1kbqkwmxd

He actually made an email asking us to report things after hiring king big mouth dirty fed? If this is true he has some fu--ing nerve fhe lawyers must have told him to say that but it won’t save him when something goes down. The jury will see there is reason to doubt and hold him and papa Smurf civilly responsible and the company too. I have been saving all of these communications and have an email that communications shared with a friend where they sent him some
Postings of this website. So they are watching and sharing and they will pull their history in court and the Smurf and Dave ( won’t be able to say they never knew. They know. Dave even asked if they knew about this and they tap danced to protect their hire. David may be getting fed a ton of bullsh-t but papa Smurf and his band of id--ts won’t be able to deny it. The dirty sc-m bag works for him now which makes it even better in court. He had a chance and didn’t do sh-t about him. Some of us are a big happening away from becoming rich!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @9n8+1kbqkwmxd

Neva Eva

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @869+1kbqkwmxd

I hear ya gurl. I’m in the same boat now. You gots to take care of you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4vt+1kbqkwmxd

Your fiancée is right! Unfortunately it’s the fu--ing box we have been in so don’t feel bad. We didn’t create this fu--ing mess and we can’t do anything about it. When people hand you lemons, we have to make Lemonade..

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4vr+1kbqkwmxd

I just figured out about a big theft problem with two of our drivers and maybe more. I looked into it and I was right. Now I am stuck. The way they are doing it when theyre out and manipulating the orders and returns is interesting but they have friends here who scare me if they find out i said anything. I don’t trust our security man after reading about him in those articles. I feel dirty but will turn a blind eye to it. It’s a shame but my fiancée told me I need to stay out of it and just do my job. I feel better getting it off my chest on here knowing all of you agree with him.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4vn+1kbqkwmxd

It is now the new year
But reporting you will NOT hear.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @485+1kbqkwmxd

It’s a new year but my lips are still sealed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @480+1kbqkwmxd

The poetry is fine but what our execs are letting happy and who they are behind su-ks. We used to give a fu-k about employee sentiment.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3yp+1kbqkwmxd

@34j That is what I call
Poetic justice.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ww+1kbqkwmxd

Here's my poetry.

Fu-k them!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @34j+1kbqkwmxd

Yours is way too close to another one down this thread. My turn.

You ask that we call compliance and security too
But Montgomery showed they don't know what to do

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @31q+1kbqkwmxd

This is my holiday wish….

DF, if YOU see something,
Do something.

I don’t mean that ugly. I am just hoping you hear us and make this right. Please. It isn’t safe to work in this place now but I really need and used to love my job. Now we are scared and you can fix this easily. Please give us the gift of giving us the US foods family back.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2z1+1kbqkwmxd

My turn,
It’s he we appall
We see but will not call

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2yy+1kbqkwmxd

If we don’t have trust
Silence is a must

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2yn+1kbqkwmxd

Good one! Here’s another.

If the facts sanders will leak
We will not speak.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ym+1kbqkwmxd

If the colonel is your sort,
We will not report!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2yk+1kbqkwmxd

Thank you for your help but the simple answer is NO. We will not be reporting anything to these clowns.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2xa+1kbqkwmxd

This is your HR friend again who promised to be candid with all of you. I will keep it short so my HR friend near the center of all this doesn't get in trouble. The bonuses are true but are very different. One is for performance and one for retention. Both can be in the six figure range each. The time off amount is true but they must meet their goals and expectations at the end of the year. The provision of a suit and other clothes for his son is true. The training class was not a police class. It was a security class on a guarding our executives. My friend said the VP of Security asked her direct report to put him in that class and my friend found it odd that a person who was not an associate yet was telling US Foods what he wanted done before he ever was hired. We paid thousands for it and his travel costs. In the defense of the vacations, many of the managers end up working 80 hour weeks and the time off is intended to make up for that. I don't know anything about the holiday video. Keep your spirits up everyone. Not all of HR is bad. Most of us have compassion and really work hard to assist and take care of you. What they did and are doing is just as frustrating to those of us as it was to all of you. Let's be civil and bring change together. Happy holidays everybody :-)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2x0+1kbqkwmxd

That is not news to most of us. After all, they paid for a suit for the CEO's son and all of his police classes to get him training he should have already had. The other posts say they also paid for consultants to give his boss ideas on what to do and consulting on what he should do. The Kernal even said the big boss is flying private planes according to other posts. They take care of their own while we get fu---d!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2re+1kbqkwmxd

Are you for real? Managers get to take as much vacation as they want?????????????????

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2qw+1kbqkwmxd

Here is something I see. I tried to call HR in the region and was told she is off until January. I then called corporate HR and they told me that most people in corporate are off until January because "they get as many holidays as they want"? She admitted it was not a good rule but that it is in "their contracts". I know her and have for years and years so she opened up and said there is much she does not agree with and that their chief HRO had really "sc--wed things up and had not been very ethical in how he led their team". And she said they all hate the Cornal Sanders even though she didn't know he was called that and didn't know about this site. I don't want to name her to protect her since she was being honest. If you are reading this, you will see that we all know everything you told me about Cornal Sanders and it confirms that you are all right how you view him. You said you all thought your Chief HRO would have gotten rid of him and were all surprised and disappointed he hadn't but maybe they are two peas in a pot. I don't know, but that "all the vacation and personal time they want" rule corporate managers get as long as they get their job done is BULLSH-T! No wonder our execs are sitting at home on the video.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2pd+1kbqkwmxd

Patience? There is never patience or delays to do the right thing when it comes to safety. We are scared, many are packing their home g-ns , and no one is reporting sh-t. We are unsafe at work. Don't ask us to report until you have fixed the reason we are not reporting. It's clearly that simple. A real CEO cares so much for his team that when something or someone is in the way of safety, they correct it fast. Please just help us.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2hk+1kbqkwmxd

Patience? Patience? Are you fu--ing serious? No!

If they are being patient with him, then they have to be patient to us reporting anything. If the kernel is involved, we are NOT saying sh-t.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2de+1kbqkwmxd

I have a close friend in HR and she completely understands why our associates are worried about reporting incidents to her and other HR reps. She said she has been in calls and a private call with the Security VP and she felt dirty just talking to him. She said he has "adapted" a soft voice that is not as "cocky and rude" as when she first spoke to him. She said he is trying to change his image but the words coming out of his mouth are still "condenscending" to others and their ideas and talks too much negativity about previous cases and the way our leaders and our Field VP of HR trying to push her way but that she is learning from him to take more of a step back because her old way wasn't right and why he is having to fix it all. He told my friend she needed to opined less do the same thing he asked of "Suze". I say that to say, if HR teams have heartburn with him, why are they expecting us to buy it? In my 20 years here, HR used to listen to us and make decisions that were better for us but he must have dirt on people to get away with all he does and says. I have hopes that they will figure it out. We just need to be patient until they do.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2dd+1kbqkwmxd

Alright. I saw something and will say it here. I noticed a group of execs chilling at home making holiday videos instead of coming to our workplaces and sharing our hands and celebrating with us. Now, what are you going to do about that? It’s no wonder you have that guy leading security. You all remind me of that movie “trading places”. The execs are the Dukes and our col. sanders is the security guy in the movie who is also crooked. Watch that and it will show you what we see.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @26b+1kbqkwmxd

That email did sh-t to get us comfortable and trusting our leaders. Get rid of the sc-m bag and we can go back to what we were the last 15 or so years that I have been here. Quit pu--y footing around who you know the problem is,

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @200+1kbqkwmxd

Thank you! Please tell him about the ethics & compliance manager or Director who didn't do sh-t and tried to find out who is posting here instead of doing something to save the associates. He fu---d up Montgomery first ignoring the first 6 times that there were work place violent problems there in 6 months. The fu--ing security Veep was the di-khead that still hasn't figured the sh-t out. His training was fu--ing useless and now we have the same sh-t packaged differently. I worked at other companies that had better training and protected us better. This is the same old sh-t we always had. Please thank him for listening to us and giving us hope.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kt+1kbqkwmxd

My husband asked an attorney friend about the email after he told him about the fright we have to report law violations and the gentleman with the "jagged" past that they hired to manage security and our safety. He agrees they are "exposing themselves to substantial liability" and know we are scared to report law violations. They are trying to show they want us to report it to "cover their a-s". He said if the courts can tie in that they know of what is posted here and that communications sent it to leaders, that would be enough to hold them accountable. They could say it is an "annonymous" site but if the facts on here are true, they would know it is "highly likely to certain that there are employees posting the real concerns". He also said "their hire of a security man that is clearly unexperienced and has a shady past of telling outsiders confidential information justifies our responses and not wanting to cooperate." He said depending on the state, his firm would take the case if someone is fired for not reporting or trying to protect themselves. I am going to keep doing what I am doing in being quiet because I am terrified of this security manager's chatty mouth and his lack of experience and inability to help Montgomery and other US Foods bldgs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ks+1kbqkwmxd

NO THE ETHICS LINE DOES NO FU--ING GOOD BECAUSE WHO IS BEHIND IT. You must not have read all of these threads. Read on brother and you will know. Or sister. The compliance dude that manages the ethics line is said to have managed the workspace violent program. He was the one that they said ignored many incidents in Montgomery before the shooting, did nothing about them and then blamed the managers and culture there. He is also the one that Cornal Sanders said was trying to find out which associates wer posting here and asked IT /or digital tech or what ever the fu-k they are called/ if they can see whose lap tops are messaging here and he was pi---d they told his our IT isn't that mature and this site is confidential.

See, you are all sh-----g on cornal sanders but he has a big a-s mouth and what he tells ends up on this site so we know. Maybe he is a neccessady evil? I am a second amendment guy since he was hired and fu---d up our brothers and sisters safety so I could give a fu-k if he stays or goes. While he is here, I won't tell them sh-t and will just handle sh-t on my own.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vs+1kbqkwmxd

What about calling the ethics line? Can and will they help?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vr+1kbqkwmxd

Ugh, why can’t they put themselves in our shoes and know what it is like to not have faith in the system because of his troubled past? They either are too high up to give a sh-t or they don’t give a fu-k.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @q4+1kbqkwmxd

Like the three monkeys. We hear no evil, see no evil and won't say no evil. Get used to that answer when you ask us to report things we know is going down.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ne+1kbqkwmxd

@ae nice work on the poem, a comic post about a serious matter but I liked the ending. If they did what you said in your post, unity would return. And I miss that culture that was destroyed with a bad choice and being too stubborn to right the wrong. Nice post and a simple solution.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kt+1kbqkwmxd

It was a total di-k move to send that email 59 us. It was a CYA move given by the lawyers to cover their a-s.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jm+1kbqkwmxd

I didn’t see that email until I read this tonight. I normally skip those rah rah emails on purpose. But after reading it, it sickened me even more. The hypocrisy of writing to do the right thing when he knows all of that sh-t happened with his executives and everyone has a job still. The hypocrisy of hiring a low life like the kernal sander knowing his past comments admitting to lying and then forking it up and the other articles about disrespecting women and other sh-t about violations and even criminal acts? No sir. Not only am I not reporting sh-t, I am not speaking to them to stop when they do it. We will take your lead and when bad things happen, we will just burry our heads in the ground like I am now with a group that steals on delivery schemes that is know about. If you ever give us someone we can trust, I will but not as long as that a--hole that talks too much about even you and things like your son’s investigation is around. If he can talk about him, he can talk about us or who turned anyone in. Fu-k you for putting us in that situation and allowing this guy to even talk about your own son. You are not only a bad leader. But you are a shotty father.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @j2+1kbqkwmxd

That was a desperate email. They know they have to do the right thing first before any of us trust them. Not even the thefts gone on will be called in. Dummy may dork it up and blame us. Nope! Our lips are sealed!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bj+1kbqkwmxd

Ha ha. That’s some funny sh-t there but it is a serious convo. He can’t shut his fu--ing mouth so we aren’t opening ours. #aintsayingshit

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1kbqkwmxd

A poetic answer to the CEO’s email-

Not a peep
to that dirty cop freak!
If you need to know,
he gots to go.
Trust and ethics matter
So don’t pitter patter.
YOU do the right thing
And USF unity you will bring

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1kbqkwmxd

Again, yes Lawd!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1kbqkwmxd

Post a reply

: