Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

Goldman Sachs employees were laid off at ‘meetings’ they had been emailed calendar invites for: Report

Story by Steve Mollman • 2h ago

https://fortune.com/2023/01/14/goldman-sachs-employees-laid-off-in-meetings-emailed-calendar-invites-for-report/

It’s one thing to get laid off from a prestigious bank like Goldman Sachs. It’s another to have that happen after showing up for what you thought was a routine meeting.

On Wednesday, Goldman eliminated 3,200 jobs, or roughly 6.5% of its workforce. That came as no surprise as CEO David Solomon had already warned staff last month he anticipated that “headcount reduction will take place in the first half of January, citing “tightening monetary conditions that are slowing down economic activity.”

But getting fired did apparently surprise some employees who showed up for what they thought was a routine meeting, according to insiders who spoke to the New York Post, as the paper reported Friday.

Those employees had reportedly been emailed calendar invites for fake meetings, some as early as 7:30 a.m., at the bank’s New York headquarters. But when they showed up, they told they were being laid off, with their manager looking on.

Wednesday was internally dubbed “David’s Demolition Day,” according to the Post.

Fortune reached out to Goldman Sachs for comment but did not receive an immediate reply.

Etiquette surrounding layoffs has come to the fo-e of late, especially in the tech sector, which has seen dramatic workforce reductions in recent months, even as overall the U.S. unemployment rate remains low.

At Salesforce earlier this month, CEO Marc Benioff came under fire for dodging questions during an all-hands meeting about mass layoffs announced only the day before. One employee questioned whether the Hawaiian concept of “Ohana”—the idea of family bonds that encourage people to be responsible for each other—should still be core to the company’s culture, as Benioff made it at Salesforce’s founding.

Elon Musk was heavily criticized in November over the way layoffs were conducted at Twitter after his chaotic takeover. As Fortune reported, some employees found out their jobs were being eliminated after they couldn’t log on to their company email or messaging system. Others learned their fate via an (unsigned) email sent after the workday.

HR professionals did not mince words when weighing on the tactics. “I have worked in HR for over a decade and seen many different sizes and types of companies handle layoffs,” one tweeted. “From where I’m sitting, Musk’s Twitter is going about theirs terribly—legally, ethically, and humanely speaking. Infuriating and heartbreaking.”

On the other hand, one CEO received widespread criticism in August after attaching a teary-eyed selfie to a LinkedIn post in which he described the guilt he felt over firing staff. Detractors called it a PR stunt and accused him of fishing for sympathy.

by
| 2511 views | | 5 replies (last January 17, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kHZnvlL

5 replies (most recent on top)

This is a very common practice. I've seen it several times.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2yox+1kHZnvlL

Yeah. If you want to be known for the horrible way you handle layoffs, do as EM did.

Even though employees suspected there would be layoffs based on the economic climate, have your CEO instill a false sense of security and have him se d out out a company-wide email saying there will be no layoffs.

A month or so later, send all supervisors an email saying you need to get rid of x number of people in your group. Tell the supervisor these cuts do not have to be based on performance and go ahead and suggest a few names. Make sure to tell them it is ultimately their decision who to dump after the RE folks leave. (See step 3).

Tell all RE people to choose between retiring now or more than likely losing their job soon.

Finally, have the supervisor take their list of people they chose to dump and instruct them act as if these people are suddenly poor performers and PIP them. Whatever you do, don’t call them layoffs.

Sure, it’ll breed distrust and mess with everyone’s head, but that’s no matter to DW. Mission accomplished! Layoffs disguised as PIPs. Now everyone who knew the company’s PDS process a joke, will now know they were right. Everyone is truly on a one year contract with little consideration of the quality of their work.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wtg+1kHZnvlL

In regards to "Etiquette surrounding layoffs" EM is a pioneer and true innovator. We do it every year and in the most despicable and arrogant way.

Goldman should learn from us.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @imy+1kHZnvlL

Haha, yes! Let us side with our overlords who make many multiples the money we do, and who are responsible for the decisions leading to the layoffs (without accountability)!

Hizzah! Sc--w the worker bees! Hizzah!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @itm+1kHZnvlL

How was it a surprise? Did they want a basket of flowers first

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lpa+1kHZnvlL

Post a reply

: