For many of us that have been at Jones for a long time, we have experienced completing employee satisfaction surveys (i.e., CES fka SFA) - often with only the ability to provide feedback on a non-GP leader and the firm overall.
One positive that may come of out of this is that GPs will now have to actually have 4-5+ people responsible to them. With the firm's logic of now providing CES scores to leaders that have few reports, many GPs never got direct feedback on themselves or any type of scoring. This was always frustrating because you may have a great leader and a terrible leader of leaders.
If this pans out how they communicated (larger teams/no more 1-3 people responsible to you only), then these bad leader apples might finally get the spotlight on them they deserve. I think a decent part of why so many bad GPs survived this 'Capacity Realignment" is because the higher ups didn't have enough information to know how terrible/toxic/bad some GP/Leader of Leaders are.
Maybe I'm being naive... but at a policy/surface level, this might be something good that comes out of this mess.