Thread regarding Edward Jones layoffs

They need to lead by example

Some of the layers were addressed others were simply not. Some partners were tossed out not because their role was eliminated reducing layers as their role still exists on the org chart. This was simply ELT getting rid of some folks they felt were performance issues but never really addressed the performance, oh yes the what and the how. They need to lead by example. They judge others for what they think is not addressing performance issues when they really have no idea since they aren’t close to the work they just think the person is blah blah blah yet the have people directly responsible to them that they never addressed but pushed them out during ER. Lazy way out. I saw within the Business segment one partner with no team responsible to another partner what is that about? And they are perplexed why the trust is lost.

Well said, @a9+1jymbmavs.

by
| 911 views | | 1 reply (July 10) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jz6fv7e2

1 reply

Ted Jones would be sickened and appalled at PP. She is the Black Plague of EDJ. Business analysts will be discussing the downfall of EDJ for years to come and every single sign will point back to PP and her AWFUL misuse of all the associates’ trust.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1aa+1jz6fv7e2

Post a reply

: