Thread regarding Edward Jones layoffs

Cold, Silent, and Disconnected and Far From Human Centered

Heard back in 2001, that Technology (IT) brought in a consultant-turned-GP who asked everyone to submit their resume not for elimination, but for conversation. Every single person had a one-on-one meeting to discuss their role, their work, and their contributions. It was personal. It was respectful. It recognized the human beings behind the job titles.

I would take that approach a thousand times over what’s happening now.

This process feels cold, detached, and dehumanizing. It removes the human-centered element entirely, reducing people to faceless names on a spreadsheet. Employees are expected to silently entrust their entire future to their Layer 4 manager’s interpretation of their value without ever being given the opportunity to speak for themselves. There is no room for context, no place for voice.

There’s a deep and troubling disconnect between those at Layer 4 and those at Layer 8 and lower. How can we call this the “best” path forward simply because a third-party firm, BCG, declares it so?

These are not just roles. These are people. Loyal, dedicated people who have invested years into this company. If decisions must be made, at the very least, let them be made with empathy, transparency, and a recognition of the human beings impacted.

We owe each other that much.

by
| 1331 views | | 3 replies (last July 1) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jz18rrt7

3 replies (most recent on top)

@a8 Couldn't agree more.

Enterprise Reimagined has ensured that I don't know who I'll report to or what I'll be working on at the end of September.

For that level of instability, I need an indicator that things will align in my best interests...which I don't see. I enjoyed the stability while I had it but I'm actively working on my exit plan.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e4+1jz18rrt7

@a5 The questionnaire was only given to Grade 13 and above. The decision to exclude those below Grade 13 highlights just how disconnected ELT is from the average employee and how little personal connection or consideration is being shown to the broader workforce.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1jz18rrt7

Agreed. Cascade 1 had a talent matching questionnaire which at least indicated that skills and fit were being considered. Cascade 2 does not have any formal mechanism to advocate for yourself, especially if you're being considered for consolation with a larger team.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1jz18rrt7

Post a reply

: