Cascade 1 seems to have had unexpected outcomes - some excellent GPs being let go while some lousy GPs being retained and/or promoted. I wonder if those decisions were based on “protecting your friends” as opposed to truly assessing on capability.
I also wonder if that will be the criteria for cascade 2. Irrespective of how capable you are, you might get laid off unless you are in the good books of a GP or Director. That would be totally against the spirit of reimagine.