Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Quantumtel

If they’d just stop fooling around with AI and show the world how far ahead of everyone else IntelLabs is on quantum, the stock would be $200.

by
| 1941 views | | 11 replies (last June 20, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jy35pvh8

11 replies (most recent on top)

This is true, but please don't share this on public forums.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @h8+1jy35pvh8

Quantum is in a hype bubble right now.
There won't be any practical application for probably 25 years if that.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ea+1jy35pvh8

How long has Intel been working on quantum? What breakthroughs better than the competition have we done?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e6+1jy35pvh8

Hey ShitTel

Just give me a stable chips please

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e4+1jy35pvh8

This is the only viable long term growth outlook for intel but still likely needs a an acquisition by google or IBM

WE HAVNT INvented and gown a category in almost 40 years

Do it now and reap the gains in 203x

Stay on the same path and definition in 202x

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dj+1jy35pvh8

Intel quantum efforts seem like yet another costly toy.

Although quantum is coming on fast at this point, it is still expected to ultimately exist as something that is an added capability, to handle special tasks in the datacenter, and does not replace the existing computing.

Maybe it eventually does more than that, but like a lot of other Intel toys, the Lab effort doesn't seem to have a roadmap to revenue.

One could argue that failing to develop it is akin to other missed opportunities, but only if there is some path to the effort being competitive enough to generate revenue.

Intel needs to, like yesterday, stop funding pointless projects that have no viable roadmap to market. Pretty sure Santa Tan has a list, and is checking it twice.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cb+1jy35pvh8

Gotta say.....AI is pretty sweet. I needed to do a pretty big change in some code, and sure I could spend half a day doing it...but I created a carefully worded prompt, included some of the baseline code to give it an idea of what I wanted, plugged it into the AI and bingo...it generated the new code, even ran syntax and compiler checks. I then spend half an hour reviewing it...yep...looks good...dropped it into the target and bingo..done. 1 hour instead of 8 hrs typing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bp+1jy35pvh8

Quantum computing is great if you want a computer to give you the wrong answer 20% of the time. A normal CPU is now dealing with quantum phenomenon right now since the features are so small that effects like quantum tunneling occur.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bn+1jy35pvh8

Other companies are demonstrating their break through technologies yet Intel is keeping the best under wraps... I doubt it. If Intel had anything even slightly better than the competition they would be making undeliverables promises on a schedule that can't be met. The resulting product would be delivered late, broken, and priced too high.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bk+1jy35pvh8

I call bullsh-t on this one. Intel is still dabbling in “ silicon spin qubits” ignoring all of the new breakthrough technology in the field. Plus isn’t that a non revenue generating item that will soon get cut?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ar+1jy35pvh8

LippyBu said not to look at the stock price. Your fired!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1jy35pvh8

Post a reply

: