Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

Principal engineers Layoffs coming soon

Investors have told Cusco cut high earnings jobs and mainly targeting principal engineers, managers and directors

by
| 3962 views | | 18 replies (last June 21, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jxsbqhpz

18 replies (most recent on top)

Senior engineers and managers/Directors (aka costly resources) with not enough span of control are targets for the upcoming LRs.

If your MRR is high and you feel you have it good at Cisco, you probably are the 1 in 10 to get the package this time. Upskilling on GAI is not going to help - the IDE plugged into the AI is always going to write better code than you and you are anyways playing with machine money.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @17p+1jxsbqhpz
"they check in documents don't they?"

most PE's check in empty template Document or PPT with 1st slide, some poor DE at 2 or 3 levels down fills in all the details.. but PE gets the credit because his name only shows up (because he checked in rev 0)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @t2+1jxsbqhpz
Most PE at Cisco = normal engineer anywhere else...

No, most PEs at Cisco are far less than Engineer 1s at my first company in the 1980s by a wide range of metrics. The costs major programs incurred which were delayed by years to outright cancelled due directly to easily avoidable PE failures were staggering.

Most are PPT creators and politicians and don't know sh-t.

We've known that for decades based on the fact that the PowerPoint and Word documents were clearly plagiarized in a way that the combined texts were self contradictory nonsense because the PEs couldn't even understand what they had stolen. I got a chance to talk about it with a Senior VP and his response was "they check in documents don't they?" because that's the only metric for that kind of work. As long as the dashboards are green everyone gets a bonus!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sx+1jxsbqhpz

Most PE at Cisco = normal engineer anywhere else, so far as the PE star fallen. Most are PPT creators and politicians and don't know sh-t.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @s1+1jxsbqhpz

This is one of the rumors I always want to believe every year. Really irks me to see Mgrs and Dirs with fewer than 5 direct reports.

There's not enough DE's & PE's to make a difference.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @km+1jxsbqhpz

these posts are just cope therapy...projecting the world we want to see rather than the world that is

when has Cisco ever taken the rational path? do you even care anymore?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @k3+1jxsbqhpz
They make it 10 years to get from G12 to PE only for them to sit on their as--s

If all they did was eat paste I'd be fine with it. Having to stop my own work to work around and patch their egregious mistakes over and over and over again is infuriating. I've worked with a lot of them and I can't point to a single thing they got right.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hn+1jxsbqhpz

They make it 10 years to get from G12 to PE only for them to sit on their as--s

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hg+1jxsbqhpz

First line, second line are sure to go. They produce nothing and just peon of VP and above. Easy to send them home.

Principal Engineers and Architects seem to create atmosphere of getting some work done, but they just talk and produce nothing. Easy to pack them too.

Easy to get rid, and shuffle the direct reports to others. Save lot of money while shrinking garbage work force.

Once these gone, Cisco will be short 30%, just what G2 is planning to cut with AI.

Mission accomplished.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @h4+1jxsbqhpz

I say start monitoring tasks that actually create something not just talk, see just how many are ghostworking - 95%+ - and go from there

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gv+1jxsbqhpz

Many foreign replacements champing at the bit for pennies on the dollar.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fw+1jxsbqhpz

How many?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cq+1jxsbqhpz

Makes perfect sense to fire PEs at Cisco. Some Bs are staying there wihtout any impact for 25 years or more.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ch+1jxsbqhpz

Customers, employees and investors have said these things over the ages and nothing changed. A few up to the DE and VP level "left to spend time with their family" but they're replaced with Cisco people conditioned to make the same mistakes. Cisco is too comfortable with the mistakes it's been making for decades and until it's clearly on the brink of collapse I'm betting against leadership driving meaningful positive change.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cf+1jxsbqhpz

No it's middle managers. Almost all. Removing 2-3 layers of management. PMs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c4+1jxsbqhpz

@b9 i would rather pick VP/SrDir/Dir and 2nd line middle managers... First line managers not so much.. they struggle with VP/SrDir/Dir family/buddy useless hires...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bw+1jxsbqhpz

first line managers are ripe for the picking. get rid of their as--s. they produce nothing and absolutely are a payroll su-k.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b9+1jxsbqhpz

Those talking/meeting/do nothing/ P.E are the darling of Director. No way they are on the LR list.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b0+1jxsbqhpz

Post a reply

: