Thread regarding Xerox Corp. layoffs

*32% OF THE REQUIRED VOTES

SB has said this repeatedly, and it's been in the quarterly filings. When you look at the ownership, it makes no sense: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexmark

The ownership is:
Ninestar (formerly Apex Technology): 51%
PAG Asia Capital: 43%
Legend Holdings: 6%

So, first off, it's clear that they don't have Ninestar on board. They own just over half of all shares, regardless of the percentage needed to carry the vote, they will always be at least half the votes needed. Legend is too small to matter, so we're looking at PAG. 43% is not 32%, so the magic number is not 50%+1, it's probably 75% (43% X 0.75 = 32.25%).

The other way to get to "32% of the required votes" is if it is 50%+1, and THEY ONLY HAVE 32% OF NINESTAR SHAREHOLDERS THAT BOUGHT IN TO THE MERGER, hence 32% "of the votes needed."

I think it's the former. Ninestar is HQ''d in China, PAG is in Hong Kong, and is comprised of investor money. PAG wants out - bad, as well they should. Ninestar is in the sphere of influence of the CCP, and will vote how, and when the party chooses.

Also, SB said they are "expecting" to close this by the end of year. Expecting is a misleading word, as the loan money goes away on 12/22/25 and it all gets paid back, w/ interest and fees if no deal is struck by that date.

Even if you are the "NO IT'S NOT!!!!" guy, you have to ask where and how SB is getting this 32% number from. They said this number out loud on the earnings call, and filed it with the SEC. Is it true?

by
| 2261 views | | 9 replies (last May 30, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jwebq23y

9 replies (most recent on top)

This is a desperate attempt for Lexmark to salvage US gov't sales. Xerox A4 are way over proceed vs HP or Brother(who suffered the lowest YOY of any OEM) In 28 years, and as a director for XRX, I sold 100X Brother A4 devices. With this acquisition, they are going to move fast, build programs and train and rebrand. Will XRX use the tiered color pricing? It was a Failure on ColorCube. I think this is a two fold desperate situation. XRX needs a good A4 line and Lexmark cant sell in the US. I'm not an economist but tariffs are probably in play as XRX is in Rochester as well.

Loosy Goosey - HP and Brother are solid. Canon is best in class and Ricoh and XRX are kings of high end production

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fn+1jwebq23y

What a waste of time.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fj+1jwebq23y

faker 👇

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dz+1jwebq23y

NO!!

wait for it…

ITS NOT !!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @da+1jwebq23y

None of that matters anymore. If/when the deal doesn't go through by 12//22/25, all that time and money is down the drain.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1jwebq23y

This deal has been happening for a very long time. Why do you think Xerox financial services was born? To handle Lexmark financials, that was in 2021. They were the first company, the main priority, in order to see their financials, to start the process.

Field service technicians have also been servicing many Lexmark accounts since at least 2018/2019.

We just so happen to go into debt to acquire the company that we have a stake in already? Come on.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1jwebq23y

It will be very real on 22 December

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1jwebq23y

Imagine working there and having to pretend every day this is real....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1jwebq23y

You know they say that all men are created equal, but you look at me and you look at Samoa Joe and you can see that statement is not true. See, normally if you go one on one with another wrestler, you got a 50/50 chance of winning. But I'm a genetic freak and I'm not normal! So you got a 25%, AT BEST, at beat me. Then you add Kurt Angle to the mix, your chances of winning drastic go down. See the 3 way, at Sacrifice, you got a 33 1/3 chance of winning, but I, I got a 66 and 2/3 chance of winning, because Kurt Angle KNOWS he can't beat me and he's not even gonna try! So Samoa Joe, you take your 33 1/3 chance, minus my 25% chance and you got an 8 1/3 chance of winning at Sacrifice. But then you take my 75% chance of winning, if we was to go one on one, and then add 66 2/3 per cents, I got 141 2/3 chance of winning at Sacrifice. - Scott Steiner

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1jwebq23y

Post a reply

: