Thread regarding Medical Solutions layoffs

Unfair distribution of clinicians?

Has anyone noticed that clinicians are unfairly distributed? When a recruiter leaves Medical Solutions, their clinicians are assigned to these specific "top producing" recruiters.

Are these "top producing" recruiters really top producers, or has management reassigned clincians to them to keep them as top performers?

If these clinicians were fairly distributed, would it give other recuiters the chance to retain them and prevent them from being put on a performance plans?

Would these top producers be put on performance plans if these clinicians were not assigned to them?

Would fairly distributing the clinicians force these top performers to have to work like the rest of us?

If clinicians had been fairly distributed would this had prevented multiple recruiters from being fired for not having a certain amount of clinicians on their desk?

How does this company think it is fair that clinicians are reassigned to the specific recruiters that still have assistants helping them build packets, complete submittals and their daily activities?

Why is there no policy in the employee handbook regarding this process?

Is it legal for them to reassign all of these clinicians to specific people knowing that they would be put on performance plans if they did not have people assigned to them, epecially if they get awards recognizing them as top producers at the end of the year when half of their desk has been just given to them?

by
| 561 views | | 4 replies (last August 15) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jv7rm74s

4 replies (most recent on top)

as someone who covered a lot of desks... the "top performers" would get significantly more new email leads than everyone else. Was a total crapshoot for anyone with less than 30 travelers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dat+1jv7rm74s

I totally have felt this way since day one. Every body who quits all the top performers get their people. It’s hard not to be top performing when you get free people every other week.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gz+1jv7rm74s

My gut tells me that the answer is this: Are these "top producing" recruiters really top producers, or has management reassigned clincians to them to keep them as top performers?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dx+1jv7rm74s

It's not fair. Just like it's not fair that we still receive leads that have to be forward to other recruitment divisions or leads that somehow get sent to multiple recruiters. This place is a sh-t show.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dw+1jv7rm74s

Post a reply

: