Responding to earlier question of why so many employees are willing to listen to Elliott’s argument…
It is because many of their suggestions are the same as what has been surfaced internally, yet ignored by the current ELT and some of the Leaders Group-loss of focus on the operations. People that speak up are viewed as disposable or a nuisance. This has been going on for years in refining when people (like me) hire in from the outside and offer another view on how to do things, express concerns about the number of people at the sites, or the inefficiency of how we run maintenance and reliability centrally, but are shut down by site managers that are not held accountable for the entirety of their operation.
Change is needed. Elliott may not be the best solution but if management won’t change, what options are we left with? This is our company as well! We at the sites also have a lot more riding on the success of the company than the ELT that are making far above the pay of our refining competitors and have a golden parachute despite the outcome of the upcoming vote.