Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

Internal Hiring at Cisco – No Transparency, No Accountability

Cisco’s internal hiring process is broken. Leaders have realized that by restricting hiring to lateral internal moves, they can bypass HR entirely—giving them full control to handpick whoever they want without ever posting opportunities then putting Diversity at the top of their QBR. This has created a closed system where promotions and career moves are based entirely on who you know—not merit.

A leader directly under Phil recently stated that they only wanted to see resumes from women for a leadership role. Regardless of intent, this is not how hiring should work. By keeping everything internal and off the books, Cisco has eliminated transparency, accountability, and fair competition.

I’d go to HR, but let’s be honest—HR at Cisco doesn’t have a great track record of handling these things, and speaking up would immediately expose me. So instead, I’m putting this out here: How can Cisco claim to support diversity, fairness, and career growth when leaders are openly gatekeeping opportunities based on personal preferences?

by
| 2101 views | | 11 replies (last March 26, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jpttvcap

11 replies (most recent on top)

Indeed, there have been recent instances of unwarranted promotions and hires within my team. A new hire was brought on without an interview or relevant experience, and another was promoted to lead without an open position or any formal application process.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @14b+1jpttvcap

when I hear "internal hiring" I think of LRd people in a desperate dash to land something quick

otherwise why the he-l would you bother

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @j6+1jpttvcap

It is all about nepotism. If you were not from the same village as the hiring manager, then you are sc--wed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ft+1jpttvcap

Diversity doesn’t exist if the whole company is a certain race. DEI didn’t exist then and it will definitely not exist now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e4+1jpttvcap

Would it help if I told HR I was Indian in my previous life?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dw+1jpttvcap

I agree that it’s broken, I was most blocked from being hired for a recent role due to restrictions on hiring outside of the org… FOR AN INTERNAL ROLE (internal movement is good, but only within the orgs we currently are in, apparently).

I would fall under your definition of “diversity”… so I disagree that it’s the sole factor in making movement so difficult internally.

Here’s what I see as true: Our processes su-k and take too long, our hiring managers don’t actually review candidates they don’t know, and hiring decisions are made before the JD is even posted. You can qualify for 95% of the role’s minimum and preferred qualifications and still get auto-rejected. The entire strategy needs a revamp. I agree with some of your points but blaming the “diversity boogeyman” is lazy and diminishes folks who meet merit requirements AND happen to fall under your umbrella term.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dj+1jpttvcap

Must be a newbie. Su-k it up and welcome to corporate America.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cs+1jpttvcap

Sounds right. I applied for promotions yet a friend/family member was hired. Their experience was cashier and bartender. Can’t make this up.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c8+1jpttvcap

So glad I’m Indian.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @at+1jpttvcap

Given there’s an entire team in Ops who has pushed out every non-Indian person, yes I can tell you HR is not on your side

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @as+1jpttvcap

I worked hard to be in the position I am today so I have all the right to choose my team. I don’t care how qualified you are, if you’re not family, you’re not relevant.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1jpttvcap

Post a reply

: