This is the periodic reminder that while L and D field personnel continue to perform very well under very trying circumstances, L and D "leadership" continues to perform very poorly.
"Leadership" just can't seem to gain enough traction to do anything worthwhile. It's as if they've given up.
6 replies (most recent on top)
New leadership is just as ineffective as the old, worse of possible. Ask anyone in L&D, and they’ll tell you nothing has changed. Leaders remain absent, with the new ones—mostly from Waste Management—not even living in Texas. They’re allowed to work remotely, flying in and out on the company’s dime, while the L&D budget has been cut down to nothing.
There are so many talented employees, but without competent leadership, their potential is wasted. The department will likely face more cuts, and sadly good people will lose their jobs, while the CHRO protects those responsible for its decline. Think about it—what real value has L&D delivered in the last three years?
@jk+1jnv7hfwt putting people in charge of departments and groups they have no experience or understanding of how the business functions. Then 'retiring' or exiling anyone that questions their lack of knowledge masquerading as 'genius'.
At a time when Elliott are scrutinizing everything this is one of many areas that would be an easy win to alleviate the burden on the business. This is a luxury function and is bloated beyond what other rival companies have.
A couple of examples in the West are:
- Laying off the best employees and keeping some of the worst employees.
- Failure to develop a workable plan going forward to be able to have some hope of success.
What an example of poor leadership?
"L"ean on "D"eeznuts