Thread regarding Phillips 66 layoffs

Work Elimination Program Lawsuit?

I felt like I was forced a reduction in SGL and salary because of my age? Has anyone taken legal action, against P66?
Any thoughts!

by
| 2732 views | | 11 replies (last February 17, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jkvms367

11 replies (most recent on top)

The layoffs were absolutely related to age. The corporate strategy has be public. Layoff old timers replace them with 30- early 40 year olds who think they know a heck of a lot more than they do.

Time will tell, but when you see the talent and experience they tossed to stronger companies, you have to wonder what P66 expects.

A employee with 30 years experience has TWICE the experiece the age of choosel.

That equals a lot of intellectual infrastructure equating to millions.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @146+1jkvms367

I thought the papers that you signed on your last day if you're over 40 essentially acknowledged that this was not targeted age discrimination? From what I heard, they covered themselves pretty well in that department

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @m1+1jkvms367

I know of instances where individuals were denied promotions due to pregnancy. A lot of protected classes have taken hits at Phillips

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @h8+1jkvms367

I don’t know who all got fired from R&D but the few I knew were older and had done great work in the past. It would be interesting to see if there was an age pattern.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fp+1jkvms367

Why is the same person posting multiple replies as different people?
I get it - you are old and let go. Now you are bitter.

But fact: If you are trying to save money by reducing wages, which demographic has the most to give up?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fk+1jkvms367

It’s an uphill battle unethical corporate HR folks who s_ck up to their CRHO and lawyers with consultants will spin narrative to their advantage.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e8+1jkvms367

I was part of the WEP and took the layoff rather than lower sgl and pay. And I am over 55 as well. How can we get together and look into a class action case.
Any thoughts? I still am pi---d at the way it was done.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e6+1jkvms367

Has anyone thought about a class action? Most of the people I know that were laid off were over 50.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d9+1jkvms367

It's very difficult to prove age discrimination, and the current political climates means finding a sympathetic judge will be as easy as finding a unicorn. But if you can find a lawyer willing to take you on, go for it

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ab+1jkvms367

The way they executed the "Work Elimination Program" was unethical. Yet they pride themselves on ethics...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1jkvms367

I think I was laid off because of my age. I talked to a lawyer who said it was probable that I was singled out because of my age but it would take a long time to possibly win and it would be hard to be awarded more than my severance.
It left a bad taste in my mouth but I went ahead and signed the release.
Your case is different so it might be worth it to secretly consult with a lawyer.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1jkvms367

Post a reply

: